2012
DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2012.761011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest research and gender: a review of available methods for promoting equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reiterating the benefits of gender research for forestry, the review discussed what prevents the inclusion of gender in forestry research and offered methods for gender integration. Colfer and Minarchek (2012) explore this topic further and suggest an array of approaches to gender analysis, differentiated according to the time, resources, and expertise available to researchers, noting that any gender analysis is better than none at all. A few other studies synthesize the content of forestry and agroforestry studies that include gender (Colfer et al 2015, Kiptot andFranzel 2012).…”
Section: Gender In the Jungle: Women Gender The Environment And Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reiterating the benefits of gender research for forestry, the review discussed what prevents the inclusion of gender in forestry research and offered methods for gender integration. Colfer and Minarchek (2012) explore this topic further and suggest an array of approaches to gender analysis, differentiated according to the time, resources, and expertise available to researchers, noting that any gender analysis is better than none at all. A few other studies synthesize the content of forestry and agroforestry studies that include gender (Colfer et al 2015, Kiptot andFranzel 2012).…”
Section: Gender In the Jungle: Women Gender The Environment And Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also stress that gender analysis must consider "existing gendered structural barriers" and "a broader sociopolitical perspective" (199). Gelinas et al (2015) cite gender mainstreaming in framing their research, specifically the 'gender box' framework (Colfer and Minarchek 2012), and distinguish between gender approaches that focus on equality versus those that focus exclusively on women. Mbosso et al (2015) mostly discuss the ways in which responsibilities in food production are often gendered, noting that these roles can change over time.…”
Section: Conceptualizations Of Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had recently done an extensive methodological literature survey (Colfer & Minarchek 2012a, 2012b and developed a conceptual framework on gender and forest governance (The Gender Box, Colfer, 2013), both of which helped us place our work within a broader theoretical context. But for practical, project purposes, we needed to narrow our perspective and identify the specific questions that relate to governance 5 in rural Sulawesi.…”
Section: Methodological Development and Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's leadership in NRM Though gender issues have received growing attention in both development and natural resource management (NRM; Rocheleau et al 1996;Mai et al 2011, Colfer & Minarchek 2012, generally these efforts have not focused on women's leadership. 4 One reason is that participatory projects tend to tap into preexisting local networks, which are typically male dominated.…”
Section: Navigating Gender Structure 109mentioning
confidence: 99%