2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest restoration rehabilitates soil multifunctionality in riparian zones of sugarcane production landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our findings suggest that the positive effect of increasing complexity on MAOC, P, macroporosity and AWC is not constrained to the most shallow topsoil (0-10 cm) layer, but impacts (at least) the top 30 cm evenly. That is in contrast to studies on forest restoration conducted in the same region, which showed that even after 15 years positive effects on multiple soil-based ecosystem services were concentrated in the 0-10 cm layer (Bieluczyk et al, 2023a;Bieluczyk et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our findings suggest that the positive effect of increasing complexity on MAOC, P, macroporosity and AWC is not constrained to the most shallow topsoil (0-10 cm) layer, but impacts (at least) the top 30 cm evenly. That is in contrast to studies on forest restoration conducted in the same region, which showed that even after 15 years positive effects on multiple soil-based ecosystem services were concentrated in the 0-10 cm layer (Bieluczyk et al, 2023a;Bieluczyk et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…20-30 cm). This has been observed in naturally regenerating forests in south-eastern Brazil (Bieluczyk et al, 2023b). While global studies show that C sequestration rates (Mg ha -1 year -1 ) are highest in the early years of agroforestry implementation (Feliciano et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2020), it could still be that complexity and age positively interact, meaning that older and more complex systems would have stronger effects on ecosystem service indicators than younger ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The soil functions indicated by these properties are as follows: (i) soil bulk density is associated with the support for root growth; (ii) jointly, macroporosity and microporosity represent the soil aeration and water retention capacity; (iii) soil pH reveals soil acidity regulation for nutrient uptake; (iv) available P and the sum of bases demonstrate the soil nutrient availability for weathered tropical soils; (v) cation exchange capacity corresponds to the nutrient storage and release in the soil; and (vi) collectively, CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes reflect biological activity in the soil. These soil health indicators and their represented soil functions are widely recognized in the literature (e.g., Rinot et al, 2019;Lehmann et al, 2020;Simon et al, 2022;Bieluczyk et al, 2023). Therefore, these parameters were used to perform a distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active forest restoration, by planting diverse native plant species to rapidly cover the soil and rehabilitate ecological functions (Brancalion et al, 2015(Brancalion et al, , 2016Zanini et al, 2021), is the most cost-efficient method in such cases (Ribeiro et al, 2009). Recovering degraded pastures and restoring Atlantic forests are urgent and critical socio-environmental challenges for Brazil to fulfill the agreements to mitigate the climate crisis (Sá et al, 2017;Rezende et al, 2018), helping to re-establish environmental services (Lima et al, 2020) and reverse ecosystem degradation (Zanini et al, 2021), simultaneously contributing to global efforts on the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (Bieluczyk et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a physical and biochemical characterization of the soil in each sampling plot to assess VESS suitability to reflect alterations in quantitative soil indicators. Based on previous studies, the author's experience, the specific study context, and the cost associated with its evaluation, nine soil properties were evaluated and used as proxy indicators of five critical soil functions (Table 1; Bieluczyk et al, 2023;Cherubin et al, 2016;Olaya-Montes et al, 2020;Polanía-Hincapié et al, 2021;Silva-Olaya et al, 2022).…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%