2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-014-0780-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest self-regeneration following clear-felling of dieback-affected Fraxinus excelsior: focus on ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a history of around 20 years in Europe, common ash is now heavily affected by ash dieback throughout most of its natural range . Being a keystone species in European riparian forests, heavy losses of F. excelsior will have substantial effects on associated species (Jönsson and Thor 2012;Littlewood et al 2015;Lõhmus and Runnel 2014;Lygis et al 2014;Mitchell et al 2014;Pautasso et al 2013).…”
Section: Ash Dieback In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a history of around 20 years in Europe, common ash is now heavily affected by ash dieback throughout most of its natural range . Being a keystone species in European riparian forests, heavy losses of F. excelsior will have substantial effects on associated species (Jönsson and Thor 2012;Littlewood et al 2015;Lõhmus and Runnel 2014;Lygis et al 2014;Mitchell et al 2014;Pautasso et al 2013).…”
Section: Ash Dieback In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dieback, an important phenomenon in many crops and natural forests worldwide Lygis et al 2014), is caused by multiple factors, often interacting, that can be complicated and difficult to unravel. The search for primary causal mechanisms is complicated by the fact that dieback events arise from a complex of interacting biotic and abiotic factors (Muellerdombois 1987;Manion & Lachance 1992).…”
Section: Dieback Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease causes wilting and necroses of ash leaves and petioles, necrotic lesions on stems, branches and shoots, stem cankers and wood discolouration, followed by a gradual crown dieback, and in most severe cases -death of an entire tree (Bakys et al 2009, Kowalski & Holdenrieder 2009a, 2009b, Kirisits et al 2009, Skovsgaard et al 2010. In Lithuania, dieback of F. excelsior was first observed in 1995-1996 in the north-central part of the country (Juodvalkis & Vasiliauskas 2002) and since then large areas of ash stands underwent sanitary fellings (Lygis et al 2014). Currently, the disease is in its chronic phase, and the health condition of the remaining ash stands continues to deteriorate; yet, no effective control measures have been offered so far (Gustiene Pliura A et al -iForest 9: 12-22 2010, Pliura et al 2011, Lygis et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lithuania, dieback of F. excelsior was first observed in 1995-1996 in the north-central part of the country (Juodvalkis & Vasiliauskas 2002) and since then large areas of ash stands underwent sanitary fellings (Lygis et al 2014). Currently, the disease is in its chronic phase, and the health condition of the remaining ash stands continues to deteriorate; yet, no effective control measures have been offered so far (Gustiene Pliura A et al -iForest 9: 12-22 2010, Pliura et al 2011, Lygis et al 2014. Consequently, the density of ash trees in a stand is often reduced to few individuals per hectare, meaning that the effective population size (Ne) has also decreased, thus compromising the genetic diversity of F. excelsior in mature stands and in regenerating offspring (Pliura et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%