2017
DOI: 10.5399/osu/fp.7.1.4018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest stand conditions after Phytophthora ramorum management in northern California: post-treatment observations inform future responses

Abstract: In 2006, several isolated Phytophthora ramorum infested locations were selected just outside an 800-ha infested area in southern Humboldt County, California, for silvicultural treatments that targeted the removal and/or reduction of tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) and California bay laurel (Umbellularia californica), the main tree hosts supporting sporulation of P. ramorum. The treatments included cutting of hosts, cutting with burning, and herbicide removal. Important differences emerged between the tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one model captures dynamics at a small enough scale to show the decline of overstorey tanoak at the forest stand level ( 20 ha) [21]. Studies have used this model to demonstrate the effectiveness of one-off interventions [23,28], but have not assessed time-dependent controls, and strategies have not been optimised in order to protect tanoak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only one model captures dynamics at a small enough scale to show the decline of overstorey tanoak at the forest stand level ( 20 ha) [21]. Studies have used this model to demonstrate the effectiveness of one-off interventions [23,28], but have not assessed time-dependent controls, and strategies have not been optimised in order to protect tanoak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 ha) [21]. Studies have used this model to demonstrate the effectiveness of one-off interventions [23,28], but have not assessed timedependent controls, and strategies have not been optimized in order to protect tanoak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one model captures 64 dynamics at a small enough scale to show the decline of overstorey tanoak at the forest stand level ( 20 ha) [16]. 65 Studies have used this model to demonstrate the effectiveness of one-off interventions [18,23], but do not assess 66 time-dependent controls, and strategies have not been optimised in order to protect tanoak. Whilst a clear objective for control is to protect tanoak, this must not be at the cost of the overall health of the 68 forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%