2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest succession accelerates soil carbon accumulation by increasing recalcitrant carbon stock in subtropical forest topsoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After prescribed burning and reforestation, the lowest POC and MAOC in the organic horizon were found in 7‐year‐old stands (Figure 1a,b; Table S1), due to the silvicultural practices reduced soil fertility and the soil C, N, and P contents were found in the most recently regenerated stands (3‐year‐old stands) (Wu, Xiang, Chen, et al, 2020; Wu, Xiang, Ouyang, et al, 2020; Xia et al, 2021; Xiang et al, 2009; Xiang, Luo, et al, 2022; Xiang, Xu, et al, 2022). The loss of SOC in the studied plots is related to the (i) decrease of litter input, (ii) intensive uptake of nutrients by the growing trees (Wang et al, 2018), (iii) enhanced activities of microorganisms, which are stimulated by the mechanical crush of aggregates releasing available C sources (Abiven et al, 2009; Johnson & Curtis, 2001; Liao & Boutton, 2008; Liski et al, 1998; Mataix‐Solera et al, 2011; Wan et al, 2001), and (iv) change of soil physical properties such as bulk density (Chen & Shrestha, 2012), which can also intensify decomposition of SOC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After prescribed burning and reforestation, the lowest POC and MAOC in the organic horizon were found in 7‐year‐old stands (Figure 1a,b; Table S1), due to the silvicultural practices reduced soil fertility and the soil C, N, and P contents were found in the most recently regenerated stands (3‐year‐old stands) (Wu, Xiang, Chen, et al, 2020; Wu, Xiang, Ouyang, et al, 2020; Xia et al, 2021; Xiang et al, 2009; Xiang, Luo, et al, 2022; Xiang, Xu, et al, 2022). The loss of SOC in the studied plots is related to the (i) decrease of litter input, (ii) intensive uptake of nutrients by the growing trees (Wang et al, 2018), (iii) enhanced activities of microorganisms, which are stimulated by the mechanical crush of aggregates releasing available C sources (Abiven et al, 2009; Johnson & Curtis, 2001; Liao & Boutton, 2008; Liski et al, 1998; Mataix‐Solera et al, 2011; Wan et al, 2001), and (iv) change of soil physical properties such as bulk density (Chen & Shrestha, 2012), which can also intensify decomposition of SOC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we did not analyze the effect of fine root turnover on soil organic carbon storage but a study in the tropical forests of Panama reported that fine root production and turnover contributed to organic matter addition in surface soil but this effect was minimal in the deeper soil horizons, which can be explained by the decline of fine root turnover rates with soil depth (Cusack et al 2021;Cordeiro et al 2020). Fine root biomass production and turnover contributed to increased particulate and readily oxidizable organic carbon in the soil, resulting in total soil organic carbon in a subtropical forest (Xiang et al 2022). Fine root turnover makes a greater contribution to organic carbon accumulation in soil aggregates than aboveground litterfall during the course of forest succession because of the distribution of root biomass in the soil profile (Shi et al 2023).…”
Section: Implications Of Plant Succession In Future Estimates Of Carb...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, increasing evergreen broad-leaved tree species intensified microbial C limitation, indicating reduced microbial C sources. This may have been due to insufficient C input into soils and fixed SOC from soil protection or an increase in recalcitrant SOC [39][40][41]. However, considering litter quality and composition, the first reason seems invalid.…”
Section: Nutrient Limitation Status Of Soil Microbesmentioning
confidence: 99%