2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00221.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Voices: Competing Narratives over REDD+

Abstract: The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (known collectively as REDD+) initiative has emerged as a means through which individuals, projects and communities in developing countries can be financially rewarded for reducing emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and enhancement of carbon stock. In this article, we analyse the various framings and actor coalitions around REDD+ and institutional dynamics within the conceptualisation and development of REDD+. We conclude with a ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to achieve a shift in discourse that will support transformational change, reformist policy actors as well as the media need to engage dominant policy actors more explicitly in debates about how to reduce pressure on forest from agricultural expansion, 50. Arts and Buizer 2009;Hiraldo andTanner 2011. 51.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve a shift in discourse that will support transformational change, reformist policy actors as well as the media need to engage dominant policy actors more explicitly in debates about how to reduce pressure on forest from agricultural expansion, 50. Arts and Buizer 2009;Hiraldo andTanner 2011. 51.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We draw on Hajer's (1995, p. 44) definition of discourse as "an ensemble of ideas, concepts, and categorizations that are produced, reproduced, and transformed in a particular set of practices and through which meaning is given to physical and social realities". REDD+ discourses matter because they shape policy debates around REDD+ design and justify specific policy design solutions Hiraldo and Tanner, 2011). Discourse analysis of both spoken and written text-interviews and policy documents-can help to identify which understandings of REDD+ have gained prominence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tendency to emphasize strong, freely transferable, and relatively unqualified ownership rights over stored carbon risks promoting idealized (and unrealistic) visions of unfettered carbon markets that may favor wealthy, high emitting nations as well as national governments and elites in developing countries (e.g., [53,71]). This raises the second major concern: that REDD+ gives too much authority to the nation state, thereby failing to recognize the views and interests of local groups or individuals who may not be well-represented by their national governments [31,[72][73][74]. More attention to recognitional justice ideas should suggest alternative arrangements giving more autonomy to local communities in REDD+ programs to create enabling environments by helping them to work directly with civil society groups or international actors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%