2013 Seventh International Conference on IT Security Incident Management and IT Forensics 2013
DOI: 10.1109/imf.2013.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forewarned is Forearmed: Indicators for Evaluating Information Security Incident Management

Abstract: This paper presents a method for evaluating an organization's ability to manage security incidents. The method is based on resilient thinking, and describes how to identify, select and implement early-warning indicators for information security incident management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the capability of recognizing, adapting to and coping with the unexpected [42] is relevant for this. In the safety domain, research has progressed on measuring organisational resilience through risk awareness, response capacity and support [32], and such a measurement framework has been adapted to the ICT domain [7]. Rapid changes are additionally a challenge for collecting reliable actuarial data, as changes in technology and attacker profiles can cause empirical information on incidents to quickly become outdated [8,24,26].…”
Section: Control Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the capability of recognizing, adapting to and coping with the unexpected [42] is relevant for this. In the safety domain, research has progressed on measuring organisational resilience through risk awareness, response capacity and support [32], and such a measurement framework has been adapted to the ICT domain [7]. Rapid changes are additionally a challenge for collecting reliable actuarial data, as changes in technology and attacker profiles can cause empirical information on incidents to quickly become outdated [8,24,26].…”
Section: Control Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%