2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgive me all my sins: How penalties imposed on banks travel through markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
64
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
12
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The authorities that reached a settlement with banks include the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Justice, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Federal Reserve, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, several state attorneys, and the Attorney General. For an overview of major U.S. law enforcers and regulators, see Flore et al (2018) whose methodology related to misconduct results we follow and correspondingly, we do not distinguish between settlement or verdict as means of a case closure as the vast majority of cases is resolved through settlements. However, we do not assess potentially different impact of penalties on systemic risk with respect to the type of enforcement authority as we would be forced to work with number of fragmented subsamples; with a single exception (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency), Flore et al (2018) report statistically insignificant results linked to the type of enforcement authority.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 The authorities that reached a settlement with banks include the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Justice, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Federal Reserve, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, several state attorneys, and the Attorney General. For an overview of major U.S. law enforcers and regulators, see Flore et al (2018) whose methodology related to misconduct results we follow and correspondingly, we do not distinguish between settlement or verdict as means of a case closure as the vast majority of cases is resolved through settlements. However, we do not assess potentially different impact of penalties on systemic risk with respect to the type of enforcement authority as we would be forced to work with number of fragmented subsamples; with a single exception (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency), Flore et al (2018) report statistically insignificant results linked to the type of enforcement authority.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of bank penalties on stock prices and/or profitability is a focus of much research in the field and recent applications include Koester and Pelster (2017), Tilley et al (2017), and De Batz (2020a, 2020b. On the other hand, the link between penalties imposed on banks and systemic risk has been so far analyzed only by Koester and Pelster (2018) and indirectly also by Flore et al (2018). Koester and Pelster (2018) focus on the link between penalties to internationally listed banks and two measures of systemic risk: dynamic MES and daily ΔCoVaR.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations