Forgotten electrical accidents and the birth of shockproof X-ray systems

Abstract

ObjectivesTo commemorate victims of electrical accidents that occurred in the first decades of radiology and relate these accidents to the evolution of the X-ray apparatus.MethodsDigitised newspapers, scientific journals, books and reports of legal procedures were searched for electrical accidents involving X-ray systems. Information on the historical systems was retrieved from the scientific literature and brochures from manufacturers.ResultsWe found 51 fatal and 62 non-fatal but serious electrical accidents. Most of them occurred between 1920 and 1940 and involved transformers that provided output currents well above the threshold for the induction of ventricular fibrillation. The accidents led to recommendations and regulations to improve safety for operators and patients, and spurred manufacturers to technical developments that culminated in fully electrically shockproof systems by 1935.ConclusionsAlthough largely forgotten, the development of the shockproof X-ray systems we take for granted today lasted about 4 decades and was associated with considerable human suffering. The complete solution of the problem is a success story of engineering realised by contributions from all parties involved.Main messages• The development of electrically shockproof X-ray systems took about 4 decades (1895–1935).• Between 1896 and 1920 electrical shocks from X-ray systems were common, but their consequences limited.• After 1920, transformers killed by delivering currents above the ventricular fibrillation threshold.• Inductors, static generators and high-frequency coils were generally low-current systems and safe.• We found 51 fatal and 62 serious non-fatal electrical accidents, most occurring from 1920 to 1940.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13244-013-0238-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

A Tale of Specialization in 2 Professions: Comparing the Development of Radiology in Chiropractic and Medicine

“…45 In the x-ray, B. J. saw the potential to direct the profession and to prove his theory of chiropractic subluxation. 46 He proposed the use of the x-ray as a form of diagnosis, or in the parlance of chiropractic, analysis. 47 Over time, a number of chiropractors developed slight variations on how best to find CVS on radiographs, and they created systems around those theories in which chiropractic adjustments were based on the visualized changes.…”

Early X-ray workers: an effort to assess their numbers, risk, and most common (skin) affliction

“…In this section we will only deal with X-ray users who died from metastasized skin cancer, forming 71 % of all victims with known cause of death. Hematologic disorders are complicated and deserve a separate study; electrocution was addressed before [ 26 ]. We also excluded radium users, even if they had also applied X-rays, because their time characteristics were different and because the penetrating gamma rays and particle emissions of radium cause potentially different effects (both external and internal exposure occurred).…”

Is surgery still the optimal treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer?

“…It was widely believed that radiotherapy should be reserved for surgical rejects (23), and comments that it was "worse than useless" are found in the literature (24). There was some truth to this, as the decades between 1920-1940 have since been considered a forgotten period during which radiotherapists were at times distracted with a concern for fatal electrocution by their poorly insulated X-ray systems (25). After all, this was an era that predated Hoff's development of the microprocessor in 1971, and Hounsfield's invention of the CT scanner in 1977, each an innovation that would revolutionize the field of radiation oncology (26).…”