2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12301-020-0020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgotten ureteral double-J stents and related complications: a real-world experience

Abstract: Background: Double-J (DJ) stents are among the basic and commonly used tools in urology. The DJ stent generally needs to be replaced or removed within 6 weeks to 6 months to avoid complications like encrustations, stone formation, fractures and blockades of stents. However, in many cases the stent is forgotten. In this retrospective study, we report our experience in the management of forgotten stents and steps taken by us in preventing DJ stent-related morbidity. Results: Of the total of 30 patients, 80% (n =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, DJ stent can have many other complications such as obstruction, insufficient drainage, stone formation and migration. 5 In our case, the double J catheter was kept in place for 13 years, interestingly there was no encrustation, and it was removed easily without breaking down. The only complication discovered in this patient is migration of the catheter down to upper ureter, we do not know when this happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Furthermore, DJ stent can have many other complications such as obstruction, insufficient drainage, stone formation and migration. 5 In our case, the double J catheter was kept in place for 13 years, interestingly there was no encrustation, and it was removed easily without breaking down. The only complication discovered in this patient is migration of the catheter down to upper ureter, we do not know when this happen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The indications for stent insertion have increased and the patients presenting with complications of stent have become more frequent. 1 , 2 The complication in our case was propagation of the double J stent in the kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, recurrent UTI was less common (26.7%). [ 10 ] Our patient seems to have overlooked the persistence of these nonspecific urinary symptoms and lacked medical awareness about DJS management. Thus, patients with an indwelling ureteral stent should be closely followed for systematic stent management and potential stent-related urinary complications in consideration of their socioeconomic status, education level, and compliance with urologic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%