2015
DOI: 10.1643/ch-14-015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forked Tongues Revisited: Molecular Apomorphies Support Morphological Hypotheses of Squamate Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined analyses of molecular and morphological data have also supported the molecular trees [12,13], and have shown that the support for the morphological tree is problematic. Nevertheless, some authors have continued to question the placement of iguanians by molecular data [6,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined analyses of molecular and morphological data have also supported the molecular trees [12,13], and have shown that the support for the morphological tree is problematic. Nevertheless, some authors have continued to question the placement of iguanians by molecular data [6,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though our TED analysis includes molecular data for only 21 lineages, the resulting topological reorganization impacts the position of many other lineages. Previous studies have shown that molecular data can modify the position of fossils (e.g., Wiens et al 2010; Arcila et al 2015), but these topological changes cannot be corroborated with independent data sources, leading some to doubt whether they represent improvements in phylogenetic accuracy (McMahan et al 2015). In our morphological analyses (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have expressed doubts that this matter is settled [ 29 , 31 , 44 , 45 , 68 ]. Some authors have even chosen to continue employing a scleroglossan phylogenetic framework [ 69 , 70 ], while others have used both topologies to explore the evolutionary history of novel characters and particular sub-taxa [ 71 75 ], further indicating that a consensus has yet to be reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%