2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.04938
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form factors of $B\toπ\ellν$ and a determination of $|V_{ub}|$ with Möbius domain-wall-fermions

Abstract: Using a fully relativistic lattice fermion action, we compute the form factors of the semileptonic decay B → π ν, which is required for the determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element |V ub |. We employ the Möbius domain-wall fermion formalism for the generation of lattice ensembles with 2+1 sea quark flavours as well as for the valence heavy and light quarks. We compute the form factors at various values of the lattice spacing and multiple light and heavy quark masses, and extrapolate the re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best precision of ≈ 4 % has been achieved by Fermilab/MILC by simulating the lattice cutoffs ≲ 4.4 GeV, pion masses down to 𝑀 𝜋 ∼ 165 MeV and by using the so-called Fermilab approach, namely a HQET re-interpretation of the Wilson quark action [10]. Recently, the JLQCD Collaboration calculated the form factors through the relativistic approach using the Möbius domain-wall action [11] for all relevant quark flavors [9]. Their accuracy is typically 10 % at similar lattice cutoffs but with larger 𝑀 𝜋 ≳ 230 MeV.…”
Section: 𝐵 → 𝜋ℓ𝜈 Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best precision of ≈ 4 % has been achieved by Fermilab/MILC by simulating the lattice cutoffs ≲ 4.4 GeV, pion masses down to 𝑀 𝜋 ∼ 165 MeV and by using the so-called Fermilab approach, namely a HQET re-interpretation of the Wilson quark action [10]. Recently, the JLQCD Collaboration calculated the form factors through the relativistic approach using the Möbius domain-wall action [11] for all relevant quark flavors [9]. Their accuracy is typically 10 % at similar lattice cutoffs but with larger 𝑀 𝜋 ≳ 230 MeV.…”
Section: 𝐵 → 𝜋ℓ𝜈 Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝑠 ℓ𝜈 exclusive decay (dased lines). All data are calculated on a JLQCD ensemble at 𝑎 −1 ≈ 3.6 GeV and 𝑀 𝜋 ≈ 300 MeV [9]. Right: comparison of X𝐿,𝜎→0 (q 2 ) with conventional OPE calculation.…”
Section: Pos(lattice2022)238mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the supplementary materials of ref. [22] for details of the gauge configurations. It employs Möbius domain-wall fermions for both valence and sea quarks.…”
Section: Lattice Implementation With Jlqcd Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this plot we see that the form factor f + (q 2 ) in RQM rapidly grows for q 2 > 15 GeV 2 up to the value f + (q 2 max ) = 10.9 , while this form factor in CLFQM reaches only the value f + (q 2 max ) = 1.27 which is almost an order of magnitude lower. In the same figure we also give lattice QCD results [27][28][29][30][31][32] which are available in the high q 2 > 15 GeV 2 region. The form factors of the B s → K semileptonic transitions in RQM and CLFQM in comparison with lattice QCD data [30,[32][33][34] are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rqm and Clfqm Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such comparison provides the test of the lepton universality and deviations of the standard model predictions from experimental data can indicate the possible ) and the lower ones to f 0 (q 2 ). Lattice results are plotted: HPQCD [27] by triangles (blue f + (q 2 ), green f 0 (q 2 )) with error bars, FNAL/MILC [28,29] by squares (red f + (q 2 ), magenta f 0 (q 2 )) with error bars, RBC/UKQCD [30] by filled circles (cyan f + (q 2 ), orange f 0 (q 2 )) with error bars, and JLQCD [31] by diamonds (purple f + (q 2 ), yellow f 0 (q 2 )) .…”
Section: Comparison Of Rqm and Clfqm Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%