2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form-finding and analysis of hyperelastic tensegrity structures using unconstrained nonlinear programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model [P] is challenging to solve because it has complex nonlinear constraints () and () and cannot be solved by off‐the‐shelf solvers (Adeli & Karim, 2014; García‐Nieves, Ponz‐Tienda, Salcedo‐Bernal, & Pellicer, 2018; Jiang & Adeli, 2003; Tang, Liu, Wang, Sun, & Kandil, 2018; Wang, Yan, & Qu, 2019; Xie, Lei, & Ouyang, 2018). One approach is to apply nonlinear optimization methods (Arcaro & Adeli, 2019; Bie, Xiong, Yan, & Qu, 2020; Z. Chen & Liu, 2019; Pu et al., 2019; Qu, Yu, Zhou, Lin, & Wang, 2020; Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Turskis, & Adeli, 2016; Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Vilutiene, & Adeli, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhou, Yu, & Qu, 2020), such as Newton method or quasi‐Newton method (Branam, Arcaro, & Adeli, 2019), but they do not guarantee global optimality. Another approach is to use metaheuristics, such as neural networks (Adeli & Karim, 1997; Rokibul Alam, Siddique, & Adeli, 2019), spider monkey optimization (Akhand, Ayon, Shahriyar, Siddique, & Adeli, 2020), and particle swarm optimization (Hossain, Akhand, Shuvo, Siddique, & Adeli, 2019), but these methods do not even guarantee local optimality.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model [P] is challenging to solve because it has complex nonlinear constraints () and () and cannot be solved by off‐the‐shelf solvers (Adeli & Karim, 2014; García‐Nieves, Ponz‐Tienda, Salcedo‐Bernal, & Pellicer, 2018; Jiang & Adeli, 2003; Tang, Liu, Wang, Sun, & Kandil, 2018; Wang, Yan, & Qu, 2019; Xie, Lei, & Ouyang, 2018). One approach is to apply nonlinear optimization methods (Arcaro & Adeli, 2019; Bie, Xiong, Yan, & Qu, 2020; Z. Chen & Liu, 2019; Pu et al., 2019; Qu, Yu, Zhou, Lin, & Wang, 2020; Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Turskis, & Adeli, 2016; Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Vilutiene, & Adeli, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhou, Yu, & Qu, 2020), such as Newton method or quasi‐Newton method (Branam, Arcaro, & Adeli, 2019), but they do not guarantee global optimality. Another approach is to use metaheuristics, such as neural networks (Adeli & Karim, 1997; Rokibul Alam, Siddique, & Adeli, 2019), spider monkey optimization (Akhand, Ayon, Shahriyar, Siddique, & Adeli, 2020), and particle swarm optimization (Hossain, Akhand, Shuvo, Siddique, & Adeli, 2019), but these methods do not even guarantee local optimality.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization design has been introduced into the field of civil engineering for several decades, to improve the safety, as well as the economics and serviceability of structures, which is especially efficient concerning uncertain loadings. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Park and Kwon 18 and Park et al 19 conducted optimization for high-rise buildings subjected to seismic loads, in which the dynamic lateral force was simplified and represented, for convenience, by an equivalent static one. More recently, Xu et al 20,21 proposed procedures for multi-objective optimization of high-rise buildings for linear and nonlinear structures, in which the stochastic dynamic excitations were considered as inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization design has been introduced into the field of civil engineering for several decades, to improve the safety, as well as the economics and serviceability of structures, which is especially efficient concerning uncertain loadings 12–17 . Park and Kwon 18 and Park et al 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous research in the field of tensegrity structures concerned both the classical [25,26] and the controllable [27] structures, and was aimed at development of form-finding methods, control algorithms and applications limited mainly to civil engineering. In particular, the procedure for form-finding of tensegrity structures was studied in [14], while another approach extended to hyperelastic tensegrity structures based on strut finite elements and unconstrained nonlinear programming was shown in [28]. The problems of tensegrity forms control were also considered by researchers in the case of simple planar [29], spatial [30,31] structures or footbridges [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%