2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8893-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formability evaluation for low conductive sheet metal by novel specimen design in electromagnetic forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This range of strain rates lies within the loading conditions attained in dynamic forming processes (e.g. see Dariani et al (2009), Golovashchenko et al (2013) and Li et al (2017), among others). Moreover, the numerical results reported by N'souglo et al (2020) and Zheng et al (2020) indicated that the effect of inertia on neck retardation starts to be important for L−1 in the range 0.06 − 0.1.…”
Section: The Effect Of Porositysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This range of strain rates lies within the loading conditions attained in dynamic forming processes (e.g. see Dariani et al (2009), Golovashchenko et al (2013) and Li et al (2017), among others). Moreover, the numerical results reported by N'souglo et al (2020) and Zheng et al (2020) indicated that the effect of inertia on neck retardation starts to be important for L−1 in the range 0.06 − 0.1.…”
Section: The Effect Of Porositysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, in many instances, failures occur at regions other than the apex, which lead to a non-constant strain path. This can be observed in the results of Li et al [10], where failure is seen at the die entry radius. In electrohydraulic forming, Rohatgi et al [11] observed fracture at the ligament in cruciform-shaped specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The calculations presented in this section are performed for two different imposed initial major strain rates 361ε 0 xx = 500 s −1 and 10000 s −1 , for which the value of the inertia parameter isL −1 ≈ 0.005 and ≈ 0.1, respectively. et al ( 2009), Golovashchenko et al (2013) and Li et al (2017), among others). Moreover, the numerical results reported by N'souglo et al (2020) and Zheng et al (2020) indicated that the effect of inertia on neck retardation starts to be important forL −1 in the range 0.06 − 0.1.…”
Section: The Effect Of Porosity 360mentioning
confidence: 93%