2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45231-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Analysis of the Wnt/β-catenin through Statistical Model Checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So it's a performance study to detect any source of failure. This objective is summarized in a study to evaluate and compare several models of manufacturing systems by selecting the most suitable according to specific pre-selection criteria [64]. Our modeling process combines new formal tools specific to WPTSPN, with those of SPN [63] [64] to formulate a clear and expressive approach to specification, analysis, evaluation, and the checking process.…”
Section: Study Case: Flexible Manufacturing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it's a performance study to detect any source of failure. This objective is summarized in a study to evaluate and compare several models of manufacturing systems by selecting the most suitable according to specific pre-selection criteria [64]. Our modeling process combines new formal tools specific to WPTSPN, with those of SPN [63] [64] to formulate a clear and expressive approach to specification, analysis, evaluation, and the checking process.…”
Section: Study Case: Flexible Manufacturing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution is in extending [JLS13] with new adaptive level algorithms based on branching simulation, and to show that this permits to get a more precise estimate of the rare probability. -In [BGGM14], the authors propose an application of SMC to systems biology. They develop a new logic and new SMC techniques for such systems.…”
Section: Content Of the Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In computational (systems) biology, model checking approaches have been employed for model verification [ 17 32 ], parameter estimation/synthesis [ 33 – 42 ], model construction (i.e. both model parameters and structure/topology) [ 43 , 44 ], and robustness computation (considering various perturbations) [ 39 , 44 47 ]; see recent review papers [ 48 50 ] for a more detailed description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are appropriate for small scale systems where the spatial domain is usually not represented explicitly (e.g. cell cycle [ 23 , 27 , 32 , 36 , 44 , 46 , 51 ], gene expression/regulatory networks [ 20 , 35 , 39 , 52 , 53 ], signalling pathways [ 17 , 22 , 25 , 28 30 , 38 , 46 , 54 – 56 ]). These model checking approaches cannot be directly employed to verify either spatial computational models because they do not consider how spatial properties change over time, or multilevel computational models because they do not distinguish between different levels of organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%