1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199903)14:3<183::aid-gps969>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal and informal support: the great divide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that people claimed that they themselves or (together with) significant others played a key role in organising care, and not the care professional. This is in line with the conclusion from Lyons and Zarit (1999), who state that regardless of the degree of the availability and eligibility of formal services, the informal caregiver -if present -stays generally responsible for seeking out such services, not the professional. When reflecting on perceived control in relation to the informal care, our study shows that providing (instrumental, emotional) support or care is a pathway through which these informal helpers can positively contribute to an overall sense of control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We found that people claimed that they themselves or (together with) significant others played a key role in organising care, and not the care professional. This is in line with the conclusion from Lyons and Zarit (1999), who state that regardless of the degree of the availability and eligibility of formal services, the informal caregiver -if present -stays generally responsible for seeking out such services, not the professional. When reflecting on perceived control in relation to the informal care, our study shows that providing (instrumental, emotional) support or care is a pathway through which these informal helpers can positively contribute to an overall sense of control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The behavioural model proposed by Andersen and colleagues (Aday and Andersen 1974;Andersen 1995Andersen , 2008Andersen and Newman 1973) has become the dominant model in this research field (Calsyn and Winter 2000;Kadushin 2004;Lyons and Zarit 1999 (Larsson 2004;Geerts 2010;Kadushin 2004). The Andersen model has also proved useful for analysing the predictors of informal care.…”
Section: Individual-level Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the 'redistributive paradox' thesis (Korpi & Palme, 1998), one may expect that universal provision of home help services benefit the poorest elderly more than means-tested provision. However, expectations about the effects of welfare regime on adult children giving care to their parents range between two opposite theses: the crowding out and the crowding in effect (Lyons et al, 1999;Daatland et al, 2003). The crowding out thesis highlights the substitution effect of care services, predicting a reduction in adult children's care giving if welfare states increase the provision of public services.…”
Section: The Effects Of Welfare Regimes On Intergenerational Solidaritymentioning
confidence: 99%