Formal and parental sex education differences among Hispanic young women by nativity status

Espinoza, Luis Enrique

doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1470086

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It may be that the experience of immigrant parents, or of their children, is different in terms of their comfort in talking about sex or the cultural roles in and perceptions of talking about sex. Nevertheless, it adds to the evidence base that race (Guilamo-Ramos et al, 2006;Murphy-Erby et al,2011) and immigration status (Deutsch & Crockett 2016;Espinoza 2019) relate to family communication about sex and vary by pattern of communication.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Profiles of adolescent communication with parents and extended family about sex

DeSouza

Grossman

Lynch³

et al. 2022

Family Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To explore profiles of family communication about sex, demographic predictors of membership in these profiles, and their relationship to outcomes associated with sexual activity. Background Family communication about sex is protective against risky sexual behaviors. However, most research has focused solely on communication with parents. Emerging research suggests that extended family, such as aunts, uncles, cousins, and siblings, may also contribute to sexual socialization. This study assessed patterns of adolescents' communication with parents and extended family across three areas of communication about sex: protection, risk, and relationships. Method This research used cross‐sectional data from 844 adolescents (54% Latinx, 17% Black, 56% female) and conducted latent profile analysis. Results In the resulting four profiles, adolescents reported talking with no one, primarily parents, everyone, or extended family only. Race and immigration status predicted profile membership. There was a significant relationship between having engaged in sex and profile membership but no significant associations with risk behaviors. Conclusion This study provides evidence that youth communicate at different frequencies and sometimes in different ways with parents and extended family. Some patterns of communication are related to whether youth are sexually active. Implications Practitioners should consider inclusion of both parents and extended family in supporting adolescent sexual socialization and health, and interventions should account for extended family as part of adolescents' family ecology. Future research and intervention might consider how to engage the large number of students who report no talk with any family member about sex.

show abstract