2009
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2009.2028135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Approach to Multimodal Control Design: Application to Mode Switching

Abstract: International audienceA framework based on supervisory control theory (SCT) is proposed to assist the design of multi-modal control for discrete-event systems (DESs). Our purpose handled modes which are conceptualized by using multi-model approach. Each mode represents a running part of the system, depending on the requirements to enforce and resources to activate. The resulted framework aims to design each mode independently first, and resolves conflicting connections between them secondly. The proposal carri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the requirements in relation to the switch control of the system. Further discussion is found in [18]. Furthermore, we define C M j as the set of components used in the mode M j .…”
Section: B Multi-model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the requirements in relation to the switch control of the system. Further discussion is found in [18]. Furthermore, we define C M j as the set of components used in the mode M j .…”
Section: B Multi-model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we proposed a framework to solve it. more information can be found in [17], [18]. From now, the problem is about the behavior computed by the framework proposed in previous works and the behavior computed by the usual centralized approach.…”
Section: B Multi-model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, additional behavioral specifications are not considered in these papers. Reconfiguration under behavioral restrictions is investigated in [2], [5], and [7]- [9]. In [2] a maximally permissive mutually and globally nonblocking supervisor is determined for changing between configurations under the restrictive assumption that there is no transition period between configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, we intend to move to distinguished states, where a requested configuration can start its operation. The work in [5] enables configuration changes while meeting safety specifications. However, configuration changes can generally not be performed in a bounded number of transitions and cannot be requested at any time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%