2014
DOI: 10.1111/musa.12025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Functions and Retrospective Reinterpretation in the First Movement of Schubert's String Quintet

Abstract: The first movement of Schubert's String Quintet, D. 956, is among the early nineteenth‐century repertoire's clearest examples of what Janet Schmalfeldt has called ‘form as the process of becoming’. In this article we show how the governing formal principle of the movement's exposition is the conflation of distinct and typically consecutive formal functions. The result is an extraordinary chain of form‐functional overlaps, requiring the analyst to engage in a process of constant retrospective reinterpretation t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While refrain 3 signals the recapitulation of the main theme in a sonata‐rondo, the breakthrough obliterates its main‐theme functionality, compelling a retrospective interpretation of it as part of the development's core which follows the reinstitution of the subordinate theme and claims the function of the closing section. This leads to what Nathan John Martin and Steven Vande Moortele (2014) theorise as a form‐functional oscillation, though it takes place across dimensions in the current situation: the supposedly recapitulatory rondo refrain 3 (A 2 ) enters into a functional conflict with the sonata closing section as a result of MT ⇒ Core. The pseudo‐two‐dimensional field here recalls the formal strategy developed in the first movement of Mahler's Ninth Symphony, which also embraces a collision of sonata and rondo.…”
Section: Hexatonic Tension Formal Functions and The Sonata/rondo Interplaymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While refrain 3 signals the recapitulation of the main theme in a sonata‐rondo, the breakthrough obliterates its main‐theme functionality, compelling a retrospective interpretation of it as part of the development's core which follows the reinstitution of the subordinate theme and claims the function of the closing section. This leads to what Nathan John Martin and Steven Vande Moortele (2014) theorise as a form‐functional oscillation, though it takes place across dimensions in the current situation: the supposedly recapitulatory rondo refrain 3 (A 2 ) enters into a functional conflict with the sonata closing section as a result of MT ⇒ Core. The pseudo‐two‐dimensional field here recalls the formal strategy developed in the first movement of Mahler's Ninth Symphony, which also embraces a collision of sonata and rondo.…”
Section: Hexatonic Tension Formal Functions and The Sonata/rondo Interplaymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The idea has since been finessed by Nathan Martin and Steven Vande Moortele, who explore the possibility that in some situations ‘the initial function is not superseded by the later one, but remains in force until the very end of the unit’. In this case, the music does not trade one function for another, but holds two functions in tension, such that ‘the entire unit has a double function’ (, pp. 147–9).…”
Section: The Reversed Recapitulation Revisited: Functional Transformamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it might be tempting here to adopt something similar to the ‘reverse becoming’ arrow (⇐) suggested, after Janet Schmalfeldt's ‘becoming’ arrow (⇒), in Martin and Vande Moortele (2014) in relation to the retrospective functioning of a given section of music, I want to avoid suggesting that the process of sonata form is totalising (and can thus account fully for the preceding material). That S1 builds P function into its own parameters further suggests an awareness specifically of the failure of the preceding space to be truly within the sonata framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%