2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.00475
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Languages via Theories over Strings

Abstract: We investigate the properties of formal languages expressible in terms of formulas over quantifier-free theories of word equations, arithmetic over length constraints, and language membership predicates for the classes of regular, visibly pushdown, and deterministic context-free languages. In total, we consider 20 distinct theories and decidability questions for problems such as emptiness and universality for formal languages over them. First, we discuss their relative expressive power and observe a rough divi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these undecidability results also show that regularity for core spanners and EP-FC is undecidable. Recently, Day, Ganesh, Grewal and Manea [19] considered the expressive power and decidability results regarding theories over strings. They show that universality and regularity is undecidable for word equations, where the language for a word equation is defined as the set of satisfying substitutions to the word equation projected onto a single predetermined variable.…”
Section: Undecidability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these undecidability results also show that regularity for core spanners and EP-FC is undecidable. Recently, Day, Ganesh, Grewal and Manea [19] considered the expressive power and decidability results regarding theories over strings. They show that universality and regularity is undecidable for word equations, where the language for a word equation is defined as the set of satisfying substitutions to the word equation projected onto a single predetermined variable.…”
Section: Undecidability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%