1980
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1980.1094685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Methods in Communication Protocol Design

Abstract: serves as Vice-chairman (United States) of IFIP Working Group 6.4 on Local Computer Networks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The composed machine is obtained from a reachability graph [Wes78, BoSu80,BrZa83] that described the collective behavior of the system components in terms of internal and external actions of the system. In the following subsection we give the details of building a reachability graph and a composed machine.…”
Section: A System Of Communicating Fsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The composed machine is obtained from a reachability graph [Wes78, BoSu80,BrZa83] that described the collective behavior of the system components in terms of internal and external actions of the system. In the following subsection we give the details of building a reachability graph and a composed machine.…”
Section: A System Of Communicating Fsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the joint behavior of a SCFSM we build a reachability graph G [Wes78, BoSu80,BrZa83]. The reachability graph G is a pair (V,E), where the set V of vertices represents the set of so-called global states of the system.…”
Section: Reachability Graph and Composed Fsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) the goal state is derived and the inference procedure is successful; or (2) the goal state has not been achieved, but the conflict set in Step 2 is empty.…”
Section: Controlled Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6( The information flows passed through the communication network to carry out the task-negotiation procedure is shown in Figure 7. (2) OP5 (3) OP7 (4) OP6 (6) CELL #5 OPl (4) OP6 (2) OP7 (2) OP8 (4) OP9 (5) OP10(l) OPl (6) OP4 (2) OP5 (4) OP6 (5) OP7 (3) OP8 (3) OP9 (6) OP10(9) The job hierarchy in the example. The precedence relations between the tasks the SPT rule (Baker 1974 The definition of the places used in the nets is shown in Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If time is not modeled explicitly, then one is forced to resort to informal arguments about global timing relations in the system. Such informal arguments are inadequate and are the source of many protocol system design errors [3].…”
Section: Real-time Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%