2019
DOI: 10.3233/ao-190209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal ontologies in manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontology has also been shown to assist in feature and model selection, causal inference, 211 and automated reasoning 208 in research related to other industries. [211][212][213][214] So far, in the biomedical field and pharmaceutical industry, several prominent ontologies have emerged that cover various aspects of product development and manufacturing. For instance, Ontology for biomedical investigations (OBI) can be used to log biological and clinical investigations.…”
Section: Data Contextualization and Metadata Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology has also been shown to assist in feature and model selection, causal inference, 211 and automated reasoning 208 in research related to other industries. [211][212][213][214] So far, in the biomedical field and pharmaceutical industry, several prominent ontologies have emerged that cover various aspects of product development and manufacturing. For instance, Ontology for biomedical investigations (OBI) can be used to log biological and clinical investigations.…”
Section: Data Contextualization and Metadata Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though ISA-95 (IEC/ISO 62264, 2013) is the most used reference standard for the interoperation of manufacturing tools, it is also limited by the lack of semantic consistency in interpretation (Palmer et al, 2018). Sanfilippo et al (2019) have demonstrated the problem of misinterpretations among users of ISA-95, identifying 83 errors in a real-world example and explaining how these could have been avoided by semantical approaches. The necessity of improved standards has been recognized by Panetto et al (2016).…”
Section: Semantic Interoperability Issues In Vertical and Horizontal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated and thoroughly discussed by Ramos [16] and Sanfilippo et al [36], to date, generally accepted manufacturing ontologies are lacking; there is no standard ontology for materials, products, resources, processes, or manufacturing systems. Moreover, ontology languages have different levels of expressivity, making careful process of evaluation for each use case necessary [37].…”
Section: Semantic Web Technologies For Mps According Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although here we do not claim to address all shortfalls raised by Ramos [16] and Sanfilippo et al [36], we develop an ontology that is compatible with existing ones and that primarily focuses on recommending manufacturing processes for candidate product features and material characteristics under consideration. e suggested ontology-based system contributes to bridging the gap between product engineering, material engineering, and process engineering.…”
Section: Semantic Web Technologies For Mps According Tomentioning
confidence: 99%