2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comgeo.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal specification and proofs for the topology and classification of combinatorial surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of TGW for computing the unknown X d = A(S d−1 ) is obviously higher (see Section 3.3.3), and equates the standard in Solid Modeling. The main difference with our approach is that Alayrangues and colleagues start from a given Gmap cellular model, whose construction is quite complex and requires interactive operations with a graphical user interface or a symbolic logic systems (such as IN-RIA's Coq [85]) with a formal specification language. If simplicity metric matters, our linear algebraic representation of chains with sparse arrays compares well with chains of Gmaps.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of TGW for computing the unknown X d = A(S d−1 ) is obviously higher (see Section 3.3.3), and equates the standard in Solid Modeling. The main difference with our approach is that Alayrangues and colleagues start from a given Gmap cellular model, whose construction is quite complex and requires interactive operations with a graphical user interface or a symbolic logic systems (such as IN-RIA's Coq [85]) with a formal specification language. If simplicity metric matters, our linear algebraic representation of chains with sparse arrays compares well with chains of Gmaps.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This well-established model is highly regular, allowing for reasoning on the manipulation of subdivided objects. For instance, formal proofs with the Coq system have been studied in [18] with the help of generalized maps. Compared to generalized maps, oriented maps present the main advantage of a compact representation of objects to the detriment of regularity in dimension, making reasoning more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%