2005
DOI: 10.1017/s003329170400279x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia: an executive or a semantic deficit?

Abstract: The results provide support for a dysexecutive hypothesis of formal thought disorder in schizophrenia, and, in line with other studies, suggest that there may be a restricted 'higher-order' semantic deficit which spares naming.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of investigators have found that patients with symptoms associated with language disturbance (i.e., formal thought disorder) demonstrate the greatest level of semantic impairments (Goldberg et al, 1998;Spitzer, 1997). The extent to which these deficits are attributable to semantic or executive system dysfunction (Barrera et al, 2005;Kerns and Berenbaum, 2002) and persist following treatment, remain important areas of investigation (Goldstein et al, 2002). We acknowledge that additional insight may be gained by 1) selecting patients with a broad range of clinical and cognitive symptoms, 2) assessment of longitudinal stability of categorization approaches and 3) alternate study designs that vary category exemplars and type of categorization procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigators have found that patients with symptoms associated with language disturbance (i.e., formal thought disorder) demonstrate the greatest level of semantic impairments (Goldberg et al, 1998;Spitzer, 1997). The extent to which these deficits are attributable to semantic or executive system dysfunction (Barrera et al, 2005;Kerns and Berenbaum, 2002) and persist following treatment, remain important areas of investigation (Goldstein et al, 2002). We acknowledge that additional insight may be gained by 1) selecting patients with a broad range of clinical and cognitive symptoms, 2) assessment of longitudinal stability of categorization approaches and 3) alternate study designs that vary category exemplars and type of categorization procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenesis of FTD is still poorly understood [10]. Previous studies have investigated the relation between FTD symptoms and neuropsychological impairments in different domains such as executive functions, attention, verbal fluency (VF), working memory, and proverb interpretation [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have investigated the relation between FTD symptoms and neuropsychological impairments in different domains such as executive functions, attention, verbal fluency (VF), working memory, and proverb interpretation [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. A relation between FTD and executive dysfunctions (dysexecutive hypothesis or dysexecutive syndrome) has been discussed, in particular in the context of schizophrenia [10,20]. Another connection has been found between the positive FTD dimension and sustained-attention deficits [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal thought disorder has been found to relate to impairments in attention (Docherty and Gordinier, 1999;Harvey et al, 1998;Moser et al, 2001;Nuechterlein et al, 1986;Silverstein et al, 1991;Sowell et al, 2000), memory (Harvey et al, 1998;Nestor et al, 1998;Serper et al, 1990), and executive functions (Barrera et al, 2005;Nestor et al, 1998). However, few studies have examined multiple neurocognitive domains as correlates of formal thought disorder within the same sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%