2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2683508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification of Automotive Design in Compliance With ISO 26262 Design Verification Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the authors emphasize the necessity for a tool qualification. Bahig and El-Kadi [4] come to similar conclusions and present a general process based on formal modeling and model checking.…”
Section: Formal Verification Of Automotive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, the authors emphasize the necessity for a tool qualification. Bahig and El-Kadi [4] come to similar conclusions and present a general process based on formal modeling and model checking.…”
Section: Formal Verification Of Automotive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…And we propose design guidelines to meet safety requirements. In addition, the EMB system was implemented based on the proposed hardware and software guidelines [1]. The implemented EMB system meets Part5, 6 of ISO26262.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a second version of the standard was released in 2018, further refining the guidance to safety activities related to the semiconductor development like fault injection [2]. Although being just a recommendation, the ISO 26262 is implicitly mandatory due to existing regulations that demand "current state of science and technology" when developing safety applications [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%