“…A critical challenge in the industrial exploitation of the MTH processes is associated with the deactivation of the zeolite and zeotype catalysts. ,,− The most commonly studied deactivation mechanism is catalyst coking. ,,− It comprises transformation of active DCHP species into higher-molecular-weight ones, mostly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These species deposit inside the micropores and on the outer crystal surfaces, thus occluding the active sites. ,,,, Coke formation is thermodynamically favored and proceeds via C–C coupling sequences coupled with hydrogen-transfer (HT) reactions. ,,− Coking is commonly considered as a transient deactivation process, since coke can be eliminated by oxidation at high temperatures (>823 K). ,, Nonetheless, typical MTH catalysts are also susceptible to structural alterations that permanently modify its performance. − The restructuring of the catalyst is typically ascribed to the generation of byproduct water, i.e., steam during both MTH conversion and subsequent oxidative regeneration steps. ,,,, More specifically, when performed at temperatures and steam concentrations equivalent to those existing during MTH reaction and regeneration, the steaming treatments of the zeolite catalysts such as ZSM-5 lead to dissociation of the framework aluminum (Al F ) sites, causing a decrease of the BAS concentration. ,− Depending on the steaming conditions, dislodged aluminum can take diverse forms, ranging from partially dissociated framework-associated (Al FA ) sites to completely displaced extraframework (Al EF ) species that may still interact with remaining Al F sites. ,− Although the exact structure of the Al FA and Al EF sites and their interaction with the framework remains elusive, their generation via steaming may modify the catalyst performance. ,…”