1983
DOI: 10.1016/0160-4120(83)90086-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formaldehyde monitoring in urea-formaldehyde foam-insulated houses in St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada: Correlative field evaluation of a real-time infrared spectrophotometric method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large difference in concentrations of formaldehyde in the indoor air among different countries. It is observed that mean formaldehyde concentrations in Turkey were significantly higher than those observed in houses in Mexico, France, the UK, Finland, the US, Canada (without urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI)) [2,[24][25][26][27][28], Sweden and Australia [13,29] and were similar to those observed in the Canadian homes (with UFFI) [30]. Higher formaldehyde concentrations in Turkish indoor environments could be explained by the presence of formaldehyde containing construction materials and smoking habits in indoor environments and the low ventilation flow rates in modern insulated apartments.…”
Section: Comparison Of Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is a large difference in concentrations of formaldehyde in the indoor air among different countries. It is observed that mean formaldehyde concentrations in Turkey were significantly higher than those observed in houses in Mexico, France, the UK, Finland, the US, Canada (without urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI)) [2,[24][25][26][27][28], Sweden and Australia [13,29] and were similar to those observed in the Canadian homes (with UFFI) [30]. Higher formaldehyde concentrations in Turkish indoor environments could be explained by the presence of formaldehyde containing construction materials and smoking habits in indoor environments and the low ventilation flow rates in modern insulated apartments.…”
Section: Comparison Of Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, there has been a great deal of concern regarding the potential carcinogenicity of formaldehyde (Yodaiken, 1981). Cells may be exposed to formaldehyde externally in sterilizing solutions, e.g., noxythiolin (Gidley & Sanders, 1983), or in the atmosphere, e.g., released from urea-formaldehyde resins (Georghiou et al, 1983). Formaldehyde is also released intracellularly in the detoxification of a number of methylamines (Krieter et al, 1985;Steenkamp, 1982) andmethanol (Goodman &Tephly, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been a result of formaldehyde being released from a variety of sources including plywood, particleboard (2) and urea-formaldehyde foam insulation (LT.F.F.1.) (3). Formaldehyde in air can be analysed by several different chemicallybased procedures in which a chromogen is produced with formaldehyde-specific reagents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%