It has long been recognized through X-ray diffraction (and other techniques) that cellulose is part crystalline and part amorphous (semicrystalline) [1]. In the crystalline (ordered) regions the cellulose chains are held in mutual H-bonding, whereas the cellulose chains do not form hydrogen bonding in the amorphous (disordered) regions. In other words, large numbers of cellulosic hydroxyl groups are available for modification. During the physical and chemical treatments, these hydroxyl groups in the amorphous regions are modified, resulting in changes in swelling and percentage crystallinity.For native cotton cellulose, portions of the fiber are arranged in an orderly fashion or lattice. The fundamental unit to make up this lattice is referred to as the unit cell. A diagram of this unit cell, as derived by Meyer and Misch [2], is reproduced in Figure 1. The cell is a monoclinic with three principal planes of reflection shown as (002), (101), and (101).Using x-ray diffraction, Sarna and Wlochwicz [3] determined that the crystallinity index (CI) of raw cotton from Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan was in the range of 73-78% and that the CI values increased with growth in the maturity of cotton fibers. These CI values were similar to those obtained by other researchers [4, 5]. 1 2 3 A setup of a continuously recording X-ray diffractometer is shown in Figure 2(a) and that of a plot of the angular dependence of the intensity of X-ray photons as a function of 2θ in Figure 2(b). The three peaks for native cotton Cellulose I are (101) at 2θ = 14.9 o , (101) at 2θ = 16.6 o and (002) at 2θ = 22.7 o . Segal and Conrad and Segal et al. [6, 7] developed an empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose (Cellulose I). The amount of crystallineAbstract An X-ray diffractometer was used to study the crystalline structure of cotton fibers after bleaching, crosslinking and a combination of bleaching and crosslinking treatments. Wet crosslinking was accomplished with formaldehyde (Form W) and dry crosslinking was carried out with either dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea (DMDHEU) or citric acid (CA). Results indicated that crosslinking of bleached cotton did not change the crystalline nature of cotton (i.e. it was Cellulose I), but did increase its degree of crystallinity when crosslinked with either DMDHEU or CA; crosslinked formaldehyde (Form W) was relatively less crystalline.