2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.01796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formalisation and verification of interoperation requirements on collaborative processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, SBVR "defines the vocabulary and rules for documenting the semantics vocabularies, business facts and business rules for the interchange of business vocabularies and business rules among organizations and between software tools". SBVR is based on natural language allowing to write requirements easier rather than with a more formal language -such as temporal logic as presented in [18].…”
Section: Interoperability Requirements Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, SBVR "defines the vocabulary and rules for documenting the semantics vocabularies, business facts and business rules for the interchange of business vocabularies and business rules among organizations and between software tools". SBVR is based on natural language allowing to write requirements easier rather than with a more formal language -such as temporal logic as presented in [18].…”
Section: Interoperability Requirements Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, these works define height modes (directional, self, pure, contextual, time variant, constrained upper bound collaborative and confrontational) and their associated metrics. Finally, works proposed in [20] uses and offers an approach based and supported by formal verification techniques to verify interoperability requirements -according to the main characteristics of interoperability -in a public or private collaborative process. Precisely, the goal is to verify that a given collaborative process satisfies (or not) a set of properties related to interoperability in terms of compatibility, interoperation, autonomy and reversibility and according to a predefined interoperability requirements repository.…”
Section: Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%