2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formalizing Enrichment Mechanisms for Bibliographic Ontologies in the Semantic Web

Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of current limitations to the reuse of bibliographic data in the Semantic Web and a research proposal towards solutions to overcome them. The limitations identified derive from the insufficient convergence between existing bibliographic ontologies and the principles and techniques of linked open data (LOD); lack of a common conceptual framework for a diversity of standards often used together; reduced use of links to external vocabularies and absence of Semantic Web mechanisms t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, researchers in the bibliographic field have also worked with these technologies, especially in ontology-related topics that have led to the creation of ontologies/vocabularies (e.g. Dublin Core and BIBO), and discussions about their applicability in the Semantic Web [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, researchers in the bibliographic field have also worked with these technologies, especially in ontology-related topics that have led to the creation of ontologies/vocabularies (e.g. Dublin Core and BIBO), and discussions about their applicability in the Semantic Web [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following sections summarize the bibliographic ontologies interoperability problems already reviewed in …. Patrício, Cordeiro and Ramos (2019), adding quality evaluations of general linked data implementations undertaken by Hogan (2012), Schmachtenberg (2014) and Feeney et al (2018). And, specific to the library domain, the evaluation by Papadakis, et al (2015) of linked datasets from 7 national libraries; the analysis by Jett et al (2016) regarding linked data representations of normative bibliographic ontologies; the Talleras (2018) comparative evaluation of bibliographic datasets published as linked data by France (BNF), Germany (DNB), UK (BL-BNB) and Spain (BNE) national libraries.…”
Section: Bibliographic Ontologies Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, FRBR model is based on requirements defined for legacy systems such as card catalogues or MARC (Machine Readable Cataloging) formats, resulting in the creation of entities, attributes and relationships from pre-existing standards. Besides, as explained in Patrício, Cordeiro and Ramos (2019), FRBR entities are not data structures designed to be connected, making it difficult for RDF descriptions to co-exist with data from other communities (Murray, 2008). Patrício, Cordeiro and Ramos (2019) summarised the most relevant misalignments of RDF representations of FRBR (such as FRBRer, FRBR Core and FRBRoo ontologies) with the techniques of linked data, as reported by several authors (Murray and Tillet, 2011;Peponakis, 2012;Baker et al, 2014;Martin and Mundle, 2014;Coyle, 2015;Godby et al, 2015;Coyle, 2016;Zapoudinou et al, 2016).…”
Section: A) Limitations Of the Frbr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations