1991
DOI: 10.1016/0019-3577(91)90042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formally real fields with prescribed invariants in the theory of quadratic forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [M2], Merkurjev constructed to each n ≥ 1 fields with u(F ) = 2n and I 3 F = 0. It has been shown by Hornix [Hor,Th. 3.5] and Lam [L2] that for each n ≥ 3 there exist real fields F , F such that u(F ) = ũ(F ) = 2n and u(F ) + 2 = ũ(F ) = 2n.…”
Section: W Hoffmannmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In [M2], Merkurjev constructed to each n ≥ 1 fields with u(F ) = 2n and I 3 F = 0. It has been shown by Hornix [Hor,Th. 3.5] and Lam [L2] that for each n ≥ 3 there exist real fields F , F such that u(F ) = ũ(F ) = 2n and u(F ) + 2 = ũ(F ) = 2n.…”
Section: W Hoffmannmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, we know extremely little about fields with u(F ) < u(F ) < ∞. The only values which could be realized so far are fields where u(F ) = 2n and u(F ) = 2n + 2 for any n ≥ 2 (see [L2], [Hor2], [H3]), and fields with u(F ) = 8 and u(F ) = 12, see [H2,Cor. 6.4].…”
Section: Proof By [Elp Th H] Imentioning
confidence: 99%