Typically, serial recall performance can be disrupted by the presence of an irrelevant stream of background auditory stimulation, but only if the background stream changes over time (the auditory changing-state effect). It was hypothesized that segmentation of the auditory stream is necessary for changing state to be signified. In Experiment 1, continuous random pitch glides failed to disrupt serial recall, but glides interrupted regularly by silence brought about the usual auditory changing-state effect. In Experiment 2, a physically continuous stream of synthesized vowel sounds was found to have disruptive effects. In Experiment 3, the technique of auditory induction showed that preattentive organization rather than critical features of the sound could account for the disruption by glides. With pitch glides, silence plays a preeminent role in the temporal segmentation of the sound stream, but speech contains correlated time-varying changes in frequency and amplitude that make silent intervals superfluous.Irrelevant background speech disrupts serial short-term memory for material presented visually (see D. M. Jones & Morris, 1992, in press, for reviews). A reasonably clear picture of the features of the task and of the speech that elicits this effect is now emerging, as are the general implications for our understanding of attentional factors in memory (see D. M. Jones & Broadbent, 1991). Two views of this disruption are contrasted here. One is that the extent of disruption depends on the degree to which the sound resembles speech. Salame and Baddeley (1989) have proposed that the effects of speech and nonspeech sounds on serial recall could be understood in terms of a filter or detector system that selectively passes into memory sounds that resemble speech. We wish to put forward an alternative model, the changing-state hypothesis, whose pivotal feature is that the sound has to show particular variation over its time course (see D. M. Jones, in press). Our primary concern in the present paper is to refine the notion of change within the auditory changing-state concept; our secondary purpose is to assess the view that sound has to be "speech-like" before it disrupts serial recall. The purpose of the experimental work reported here is to identify cues common to speech and nonspeech stimuli that nevertheless may serve as the basis for disruption. Specifically, interest is attached to the role of segmentation in signifying changing state, and to the ways this may lead to disruption of recall by both speech and Thanks are due Richard Blight for his general help in setting up the equipment. Helen Bowman and Craig Steel ran some of the subjects.