2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation age and tectonic setting of the Shirengou Neoarchean banded iron deposit in eastern Hebei Province: Constraints from geochemistry and SIMS zircon U–Pb dating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is more, an age of 2547 ± 7 Ma was reported by Zhang et al (2011) for the Shuichang BIF, and an age of 2541-2553 Ma was reported by Zhang et al (2012a) for the Shirengou BIF, both deposits being typical BIF deposits near the Sijiaying BIF. Based on the data above, it shows that it was not a local geological event related to the BIF, but a large-scale formation of the BIFs in eastern Hebei province of NCC around the 2.5 Ga. A most important magmatic event would take place at 2.5 Ga proved by many geochronological data (Peng and Zhai, 2002;Liu et al, 2009;Zhai, 2010), so the Sijiaying BIF is significant in realizing the evolutionary history of the NCC at this time.…”
Section: Formation Age Of the Sijiaying Bifmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is more, an age of 2547 ± 7 Ma was reported by Zhang et al (2011) for the Shuichang BIF, and an age of 2541-2553 Ma was reported by Zhang et al (2012a) for the Shirengou BIF, both deposits being typical BIF deposits near the Sijiaying BIF. Based on the data above, it shows that it was not a local geological event related to the BIF, but a large-scale formation of the BIFs in eastern Hebei province of NCC around the 2.5 Ga. A most important magmatic event would take place at 2.5 Ga proved by many geochronological data (Peng and Zhai, 2002;Liu et al, 2009;Zhai, 2010), so the Sijiaying BIF is significant in realizing the evolutionary history of the NCC at this time.…”
Section: Formation Age Of the Sijiaying Bifmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recently, Zhang et al (2011) reported that SIMS U-Pb dating of zircons from the plagioclase hornblende gneiss suggests that the Shuichang BIF was formed at ca. 2547 ± 7 Ma; then Zhang et al (2012a) reported that SIMS zircon U-Pb dating of zircons from the plagioclase amphibolite and hornblende plagiogneiss suggests that the Shirengou BIF formed at 2553-2541 Ma. Both studies inferred that the BIFs developed in an arc setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The younger ages (2444 ± 29 Ma) are close to that of the voluminous granitic sheets intruding into the neighboring blocks in the NCC (ca. 2.5Ga, Geng et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012; Rapp et al (1999) and Smithies (2000). Santosh, 2013).…”
Section: Ttgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algomatype BIFs occur along volcanic arcs, rift zones or deep-seated fault and fracture systems in deep oceans (Goodwin, 1962;Basta et al, 2011;Li et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2014), are relatively small and associated with coeval volcanic suites. Most of Algoma-type BIFs were developed in the Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic periods (3.0-1.8 Ga), such as BIFs in the greenstone belts of Abitibi in Canada, Yilgarn in Australia, Dharwar in southern India, and North China Craton in China (Klein and Beukes, 1992;Huston and Logan, 2004;Klein, 2005;Zhang et al, 2011Zhang et al, , 2012aLi et al, 2014). Some BIFs in greenstone belts are considered to be a hydrothermalmetasomatic origin and occur along sheared lithological contacts, such as bedding and/or foliation truncation (Alexandrov, 1973;Hofmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Comparison With Typical Bif Deposits In the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%