2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and magnetic enhancement mechanism of sandwich-structure grain boundary phase in Ce magnets

Feng Xia,
Qisong Sun,
Minggang Zhu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we have defined the inverse lattice spacing squared in units of the coupling, x = 1/(ag) 2 . The charge operator in spin formulation is given by Q n = (Z 2n +Z 2n+1 )/2, and X n , Y n , and Z n are the standard Pauli operators acting on spin n.…”
Section: Wilson Fermionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we have defined the inverse lattice spacing squared in units of the coupling, x = 1/(ag) 2 . The charge operator in spin formulation is given by Q n = (Z 2n +Z 2n+1 )/2, and X n , Y n , and Z n are the standard Pauli operators acting on spin n.…”
Section: Wilson Fermionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance between the staggered and the Wilson discretization, there are two options. On the one hand, one can choose the same value of x = 1/(ag) 2 for both, which results in a staggered formulation that has half of the number of qubits than the Wilson one. On the other hand, one can choose the same number of qubits for both discretizations, which leads to double the number of physical sites for the staggered formulation, which, given the fixed lattice volumes we work with, simultaneously means a finer lattice spacing than in the Wilson case.…”
Section: Continuum Extrapolations With Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation