2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnggs.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation conditions, accumulation models and exploration direction of large-scale gas fields in Sinian-Cambrian, Sichuan Basin, China

Abstract: According to comprehensive research on forming conditions including sedimentary facies, reservoirs, source rocks, and palaeo-uplift evolution of Sinian-Cambrian in Sichuan Basin, it is concluded that: (1) large-scale inherited palaeo-uplifts, large-scale intracratonic rifts, three widely-distributed high-quality source rocks, four widely-distributed karst reservoirs, and oil pyrolysis gas were all favorable conditions for large-scale and high-abundance accumulation; (2) diverse accumulation models were develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured borehole temperature and R o that was derived from Raman spectroscopy analyses were used to calibrate thermal maturation results. Organic matter in the Qiongzhusi source rocks is mainly type I kerogen (Wei, Du, et al, 2015; Wei, Yang, et al, 2015). A NULL chemical kinetic model was used to simulate oil generation history (Braun & Burnham, 1987; Burnham et al, 1987).…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured borehole temperature and R o that was derived from Raman spectroscopy analyses were used to calibrate thermal maturation results. Organic matter in the Qiongzhusi source rocks is mainly type I kerogen (Wei, Du, et al, 2015; Wei, Yang, et al, 2015). A NULL chemical kinetic model was used to simulate oil generation history (Braun & Burnham, 1987; Burnham et al, 1987).…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sichuan Basin, located in the southwest part of China, is a superimposed petroliferous basin that developed on the Precambrian basement of the Yangtze Craton, covering an area of 1.8 × 10 5 km 2 (Figure 1a,b; Ma et al, 2007; Wei, Yang et al, 2015). The Sichuan Basin is tectonically bound by the Longmenshan orogenic belts in the northwest, the Micangshan Fold Belt in the north, the Dabashan Thrust Belt in the northeast, the Qiyueshan Fault in the southeast, and the Emeishan–Liangshan Fold Belt in the southwest (Figure 1a; Liu, Deng et al, 2016, Liu, Qiu, et al 2016).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sichuan Basin contains six first-ordered tectonic units (Figure 1A), and the research area (the North Slope of central Sichuan Basin) is located in the Central Gentle Tectonic Belt. The Gaoshiti-Moxi area is a large-scaled uplift shaped in the Caledonian movement at the end of Silurian and preserved to date (Zou et al, 2014;Wei et al, 2015c). The North Slope mainly refers to the large-scaled monoclinic structure adjacent to the north of the Gaoshiti-Moxi area.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the carbon isotope of C 2+ , such as ethane (δ 13 C 2 ), varies little with increasing thermal maturity but primarily varies with the type of parent material (kerogen) (Xie et al, 1999). Thus, the carbon isotope of C 2+ is a better indicator for gas-source correlation than that of methane (Yanhua et al, 2006;Wei et al, 2015c;Wu et al, 2016b). However, as shown in Figure 5, neither the carbon isotopes of methane nor ethane from Dengying reservoirs can be correlated effectively with those from Qiongzhusi.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface between the Z 2 dn 4 and the overlying Maidiping Formation (Є 1 m) or Qiongzhusi Formation (Є 1 q) is a disconformity. It is widely understood that the disconformity is a consequence of meteoric freshwater leaching and eroding after the regional tectonic uplift of the Tongwan Movement episode II (Luo et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2016;Wei et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2017;Hao et al, 2017), though a debate co-exists on which karstification type (eogenetic, hypogenetic, or epigenetic) dominates the formation of numerous karst products in the Z 2 dn 4 (Tang et al, 2013;Luo et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2016;Jin et al, 2017;Che et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019;Jin et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). Karstification is regarded as the vital diagenetic alteration in the formation of Z 2 dn 4 reservoirs in the Gaoshiti-Moxi area (Luo et al, 2017;Shan et al, 2017;Duan et al, 2019;Zhou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%