2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-010-0255-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation conditions of mutual adaptation in human-agent collaborative interaction

Abstract: When an adaptive agent works with a human user in a collaborative task, in order to enable flexible instructions to be issued by ordinary people, it is believed that a mutual adaptation phenomenon can enable the agent to handle flexible mapping relations between the human user's instructions and the agent's actions. To elucidate the conditions required to induce the mutual adaptation phenomenon, we designed an appropriate experimental environment called "WAITER" (Waiter Agent Interactive Training Experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better understanding of these processes will help to initiate and maintain co-adaptation in human-agent teams. (Xu et al, 2012) have outlined requirements for co-adaptation to occur in human-robot teams. First, they argue that in order to achieve a common purpose, both agents need to be prepared to adapt their behavior to their partner, should actively and dynamically estimate the partner's intention, and develop options of how to adapt their own behavior in response.…”
Section: Co-adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of these processes will help to initiate and maintain co-adaptation in human-agent teams. (Xu et al, 2012) have outlined requirements for co-adaptation to occur in human-robot teams. First, they argue that in order to achieve a common purpose, both agents need to be prepared to adapt their behavior to their partner, should actively and dynamically estimate the partner's intention, and develop options of how to adapt their own behavior in response.…”
Section: Co-adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we look at human-robot interaction literature, several terms are used that describe a similar process in which two parties or systems change their behavior and/or mental states concurrently while interacting with each other. Co-adaptation (Xu et al, 2012;Chauncey et al, 2016;Nikolaidis et al, 2017a) and co-learning (Bosch et al, 2019) are two of them, but we also encounter coevolution (Döppner et al, 2019), in which "co" stands for collaborative, also meaning "mutual. "…”
Section: Co-learning: Background and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several vision papers explaining the importance of both co-adaptation [e.g. ( Xu et al, 2012 ; Ansari, Erol, and Sihn 2018 )] as well as co-learning [e.g. ( Bosch et al, 2019 ; Holstein, Aleven, and Rummel 2020 ; Wenskovitch and North 2020 )], but a clear distinction between the two, or a definition specifically for co-learning, is missing from these papers.…”
Section: Co-learning: Background and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%