All Days 2013
DOI: 10.2118/165115-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation Damage Matters, Sometimes - Quantification of Damage Using Detailed Numerical Modeling

Abstract: Formation damage sometimes has a significant impact on well productivity or injectivity. Much of the work undertaken to mitigate against formation damage serves to qualify the impact of damage and for example, determine the least damaging introduced fluids. Whilst qualification is important, quantification of damage impact is a much greater prize. Taking advantage of increased computational power and speed, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been applied in the last five years to numerically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It impacts on well productivity and injectivity (Bryne and Rojas, 2013) and needs to be mitigated for the conduction of a successful exploitation project. This phenomenon can occur due to either particle invasion, fines migration to the porous media, chemical precipitation, organic deposition, or pore collapse (Liu and Civan, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It impacts on well productivity and injectivity (Bryne and Rojas, 2013) and needs to be mitigated for the conduction of a successful exploitation project. This phenomenon can occur due to either particle invasion, fines migration to the porous media, chemical precipitation, organic deposition, or pore collapse (Liu and Civan, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data should never be simply or directly ЉtranslatedЉ in to well performance predictions. But with careful interpretation and as illustrated in previous publications, upscaling is possible (Byrne and Rojas 2013). The lack of oil injection outlined in some of the Example 2 tests above needs no upscaling.…”
Section: Upscaling and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%