2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(14)60036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation, distribution, resource potential, and discovery of Sinian–Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
167
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The depositional environments of the source rocks were mainly deep-water restricted conditions inside shelves and slopes (Zhang et al 2005). In the basins with giant oil and gas fields, Riphean source rocks were developed in the Siberian plate (East Siberian Basin), and Sinian source rocks were mostly deposited in the Yangtze plate and the eastern margin of the Arabian plate (Oman Basin) (Liang et al 2006;Liu et al 2006;Tao et al 2012;Nicholas and Gold 2012;Zou et al 2014a). Because of the rise in sea level resulting from warmer climate and rapidly melting glaciers as the glacial period turned into the postglacial period, Cambrian, Ordovician, and Silurian source rocks were deposited (Zhang et al 2005 Torsvik 2011, 2013); and Silurian source rocks were mainly deposited in Laurentia (Michigan Basin) (Klemme and Ulmishek 1991;Zhou et al 2014).…”
Section: Source Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depositional environments of the source rocks were mainly deep-water restricted conditions inside shelves and slopes (Zhang et al 2005). In the basins with giant oil and gas fields, Riphean source rocks were developed in the Siberian plate (East Siberian Basin), and Sinian source rocks were mostly deposited in the Yangtze plate and the eastern margin of the Arabian plate (Oman Basin) (Liang et al 2006;Liu et al 2006;Tao et al 2012;Nicholas and Gold 2012;Zou et al 2014a). Because of the rise in sea level resulting from warmer climate and rapidly melting glaciers as the glacial period turned into the postglacial period, Cambrian, Ordovician, and Silurian source rocks were deposited (Zhang et al 2005 Torsvik 2011, 2013); and Silurian source rocks were mainly deposited in Laurentia (Michigan Basin) (Klemme and Ulmishek 1991;Zhou et al 2014).…”
Section: Source Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the geological factors, such as the structural movement at the timing of reservoir formation, the reservoir conditions, and the later tectonic evolution, the proportions of the concentrated or dispersed liquid hydrocarbons are difficult to determine [52,53]. Wang et al [54] provided two methods to discuss the occurrence of the dispersed liquid hydrocarbons both in Sichuan Basin and in Tarim Basin.…”
Section: Petroleum Outside the Source Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large amount of thermally cracked gas can become an important gas source kitchen for shale gas, which is formed in the mature/overmature stages by dispersed liquid hydrocarbons inside the sources [53,62]. Before 2000, many experts thought that there is no exploration potential in the area where the source rocks are highly mature to overmature, because the hydrocarbon generation is thought to have been exhausted at those maturities [20].…”
Section: Potential Of Cracked Gas From Residual Oil In Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maturity of the Lower Paleozoic shale in south China is generally rather high, but it varies significantly in different regions (Nie et al 2009). The Lower Cambrian and Lower Silurian shales have EqR o values of, respectively, 2.7 %-6.2 % and 1.9 %-3.8 % in the whole Yangtze region (Cheng and Xiao 2013), and 2.5 %-3.5 % and 2.4 %-3.2 % in the Sichuan Basin (Wang et al 2009a;Zou et al 2014). Shale generally has a quite low porosity when it has evolved to the dry gas stage (R o [ 2.0 %) (Wang et al 2013a), but its reservoir properties still change with further increasing maturity (Chen and Xiao 2014).…”
Section: Geological Characteristics Of the Lower Paleozoic Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Sichuan Basin, the strong uplifting led to the erosion of the Lower Cretaceous-Jurassic strata after the late Cretaceous, with a total erosion thickness of 2000-5000 m Wang and Xiao 2010;Zou et al 2014), and, as a result, a portion of the Lower Paleozoic shale has a current burial depth suitable for shale gas exploitation (Li et al 2013a). In the southeastern area of the Sichuan Basin, the shale system with a strong overpressure is far away from faults, eroded surfaces, and basin edges, with a pressure coefficient generally greater than 1.5 and up to 2.25 (e.g., well Y101) , which implies that simple uplifting/folding can basically retain the fluid pressure coefficient of a shale system.…”
Section: Uplifting/folding and Loss Of Shale Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%