2017
DOI: 10.3224/zdfm.v2i2.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation, diversity, and performance of student teams of two: Some experimental evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research project is motived by a number of aspects. The ongoing European refugee crisis has added considerable interest regarding migratory background, with earlier research showing that migratory status can have a significant impact on student performance (Schmucker & Häseler 2017). The present study aims to validate those prior results.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research project is motived by a number of aspects. The ongoing European refugee crisis has added considerable interest regarding migratory background, with earlier research showing that migratory status can have a significant impact on student performance (Schmucker & Häseler 2017). The present study aims to validate those prior results.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…By contrast, a negative association between team diversity and performance would be expected under the perspective of social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner 1986, Tziner 1985: homogeneous teams work together well because of the shared characteristics of their members; a high degree of similarity promotes team cohesion and thus performance. In terms of empirical research, the present study complements our earlier work (Schmucker & Häseler, 2017) but introduces additional explanatory variables and features better data quality and a refined methodology. In a setting not dissimilar to ours, Chapman, Meuter, Toy, & Wright, (2006) likewise examine the performance differential between randomly and voluntarily assembled teams, but they do not focus on diversity as a potential transmission mechanism.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 88%