2012
DOI: 10.1134/s003602441204005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation energies of molecules and anions of europium bromides

Abstract: The content of saturated vapors above europium dibromide and Eu-EuBr 2 , Eu-Ba-BaBr 2 , EuBr 2 -LaBr 3 systems is investigated by means of high temperature mass spectrometry in the electron ion ization and thermoionic emission regimes. On the basis of the measured equilibrium constants for reactions with participation of molecules and negative ions, the enthalpies of formation Δ f (kJ/mol) are deter mined using the method of the third law of thermodynamics: -59 ± 13 (EuBr), -349 ± 19 (EuBr 2 ), and -861 ± 24 (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value Δ at H 298 ° = 346 ± 11 kJ mol –1 (Δ at H 0 ° = 343 ± 11 kJ mol –1 ) reported by us earlier for EuBr does not contradict that of this work, Δ at H 0 ° = 356 ± 13 kJ mol –1 . Nevertheless, it should be noted that both values are based on the same experimental data and their difference is solely due to different functions for the EuBr molecule used in ref and in this work. In both cases the comparative method was applied but based on different data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value Δ at H 298 ° = 346 ± 11 kJ mol –1 (Δ at H 0 ° = 343 ± 11 kJ mol –1 ) reported by us earlier for EuBr does not contradict that of this work, Δ at H 0 ° = 356 ± 13 kJ mol –1 . Nevertheless, it should be noted that both values are based on the same experimental data and their difference is solely due to different functions for the EuBr molecule used in ref and in this work. In both cases the comparative method was applied but based on different data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In both cases the comparative method was applied but based on different data. In ref the functions of EuCl, EuCl 2 , and EuBr 2 were used as a comparison, whereas in this work those of LnX (Ln = Eu and Yb; X = F and Cl) and YbBr were employed. In our opinion, the latter approach is more reliable since it considers simple diatomic molecules only, whereas the uncertainties reported in ref were apparently underestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values Δ diss H °(EuBr 3 – ) and D at (EuBr 2 ) were calculated by Hess's law using the formation enthalpies of the reaction participants. The formation enthalpies Δ f H o (EuBr 2 , 298.15 K) = −349 ± 19 kJ·mol –1 and Δ f H °(EuBr 3 – , 298.15 K) = −861 ± 24 kJ·mol –1 were obtained and are discussed in ref . Additionally, the following reference data for Δ f H °(298.15 K) in kJ·mol –1 were used: 178.2 ± 3.0 for Eu, 111.86 ± 0.12 for Br, and −219.04 ± 0.23 for Br – .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the following reference data for Δ f H °(298.15 K) in kJ·mol –1 were used: 178.2 ± 3.0 for Eu, 111.86 ± 0.12 for Br, and −219.04 ± 0.23 for Br – . The data were reduced to a temperature of 1264 K using the enthalpy increments of the reaction participants. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%