“…As the transformation of 2 to 3 is reversible,w ew ere,h owever, able to obtain kinetic and thermodynamic data for the reaction in both directions.T he enthalpic barrier for a-alkyl elimination was found to be comparable to that of a-hydrogen elimination (21.5 vs. 22.0 kcal mol À1 ), and the DG°value is only approximately 1kcal mol À1 larger.T he DFT calculated barriers are approximately the same.T hese results suggest that a-alkyl elimination reactions are fully possible for this and related systems from akinetic point of view,atleast when it comes to R 3 CÀM fragments.T hermodynamically,t he conversion of 2 into 3 is almost neutral with the equilibrium being slightly shifted towards 3,the C À Cbond-formation product. [2] However,itshould be noted that the CÀCagostic interaction adds little to the overall energetics as the agostic and non-agostic forms are very close in energy in solution and interconvert very rapidly. [21] This means that C À Cb ond cleavage is expected to be more unfavorable in general, and that one of the driving forces for the current reaction is the transformation of axially metalated 3 into equatorially metalated 2, which releases some repulsive interactions in the ligand that are worth approximately 5kcal mol À1 .T herefore,for C(sp 3 )À C(sp 3 )b ond cleavage to be successful, an additional driving force is required, for example,s ome degree of strain in the substrate or subsequent transformations of resulting fragments,a sw eh ave previously shown in the hydrogenation example.…”