2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of a protocluster: A virialized structure from gravoturbulent collapse

Abstract: Context. Most stars are born in the gaseous protocluster environment where the gas is reprocessed after the global collapse from the diffuse molecular cloud. The knowledge of this intermediate step gives more accurate constraints on star formation characteristics. Aims. We demonstrate that a virialized globally supported structure, in which star formation happens, is formed out of a collapsing molecular cloud, and we derive a mapping from the parent cloud parameters to the protocluster to predict its propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final star formation efficiency is ultimately be dictated by the efficiency of feedback at ejecting gas, and if the ratio of mass ejected by feedback to mass converted into stars is 1, then the final value of * is large even if ff is always fairly small. This scenario is consistent with observed values of ff , naturally produces an accelerating rate of star formation, and also yields a cluster mass-size relation in good agreement with observations (Matzner & Jumper 2015;Lee & Hennebelle 2016b). Because the final mass that goes into a cluster was never assembled in a single cloud all at once, there is no problem with finding clouds dense enough to be the progenitors of the densest clusters.…”
Section: Figure 14supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The final star formation efficiency is ultimately be dictated by the efficiency of feedback at ejecting gas, and if the ratio of mass ejected by feedback to mass converted into stars is 1, then the final value of * is large even if ff is always fairly small. This scenario is consistent with observed values of ff , naturally produces an accelerating rate of star formation, and also yields a cluster mass-size relation in good agreement with observations (Matzner & Jumper 2015;Lee & Hennebelle 2016b). Because the final mass that goes into a cluster was never assembled in a single cloud all at once, there is no problem with finding clouds dense enough to be the progenitors of the densest clusters.…”
Section: Figure 14supporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example in Mapelli (2017) all clusters except those with stellar masses below 100 M showed signatures of ordered rotation, even though their initial conditions were non-rotating. Lee & Hennebelle (2016b) in turn showed how the properties of the forming protoclusters can be derived from the initial star-forming cloud. The high level of turbulence and strong tidal torques commonly found in the high-pressure environments where star clusters tend to form, such as starbursts and mergers studied here, makes it difficult to form a non-rotating massive .…”
Section: Angular Momentummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The model shares a common view with many of the previous ones, e.g. Murray & Chang (2015); Lee & Hennebelle (2016); Li (2017). We consider a clump with a density profile ρ(r) and an infall velocity profile v infall (r).…”
Section: Turbulence Regulated Gravitational Collapse Of Molecular Clumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%