2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1063780x15010055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of a quasi-one-dimensional current sheet in the laboratory experiment and in the Earth’s magnetotail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, shock waves should be observed (in hot magnetotail plasma the proton thermal velocity is usually larger than Alfvén velocity, and thus, fast magnetosonic velocity is about the thermal velocity v T i ), while such waves were never found in the tail (see discussion in Hoshino et al , []). Thus, we can assume that e v T i n e is the maximum possible contribution of protons to the total current density when almost all proton population is represented by transient particles (see additional discussion of validity of this assumption for various plasma systems in Yushkov et al , []). In this case, the potential contribution of Speiser protons to the current density can be measured by the ratio of observed current density j y (given by the curlometer technique) and the value of e v T i n e .…”
Section: Data Set and Main Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, shock waves should be observed (in hot magnetotail plasma the proton thermal velocity is usually larger than Alfvén velocity, and thus, fast magnetosonic velocity is about the thermal velocity v T i ), while such waves were never found in the tail (see discussion in Hoshino et al , []). Thus, we can assume that e v T i n e is the maximum possible contribution of protons to the total current density when almost all proton population is represented by transient particles (see additional discussion of validity of this assumption for various plasma systems in Yushkov et al , []). In this case, the potential contribution of Speiser protons to the current density can be measured by the ratio of observed current density j y (given by the curlometer technique) and the value of e v T i n e .…”
Section: Data Set and Main Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we describe the results of the comparison of the laboratory experiments on CS formation near the X-line region and Cluster observations in the Earth's magnetotail in [7,90]. We consider one particular series of laboratory experiments carried out with the device CS-3D at the Institute of General Physics in Moscow [28,33].…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we aim to combine such an experiment carried out on the CS-3D plasma device (Bogdanov et al 2000, Frank et al 2008, Frank 2010 and THEMIS spacecraft observations (Angelopoulos 2008) to investigate the formation of inverse currents around the plasma flow front. Previous comparisons of CS-3D experiments with spacecraft observations of the magnetotail current sheet can be found in Artemyev et al (2013), Yushkov et al (2015), Frank et al (2016. The paper is structured as follows: description of spacecraft and laboratory datasets (section 2), analysis of plasma jet characteristics measured in the magnetotail (section 3) and in the laboratory (section 4), and comparison of these characteristics (section 5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%