2014
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/790/2/l35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor Stars in the Presence of Far-Ultraviolet Radiation

Abstract: Recent discoveries of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars like SMSS J031300.36-670839.3 provide increasing observational insights into the formation conditions of the first second-generation stars in the Universe, reflecting the chemical conditions after the first supernova explosion. Here, we present the first cosmological simulations with a detailed chemical network including primordial species as well as C, C + , O, O + , Si, Si + , and Si 2+ following the formation of carbon-enhanced metal poor stars. The pre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with cosmic structure formation, not only the metallicity but other important factors evolve with time. The evolution of the abundance pattern of metals or the composition of dust grains (Schneider et al 2012;Chiaki et al 2016;Chiaki & Yoshida 2020), heating by the warmer cosmic microwave background (CMB) at high redshift (Smith & Sigurdsson 2007;Jappsen et al 2009;Schneider & Omukai 2010;Meece et al 2014;Bovino et al 2014;Safranek-Shrader et al 2014;Riaz et al 2020), the strength of the turbulent motion induced by the expansion of H ii regions or by SN explosions (Smith et al 2015;Chiaki et al 2018), and the effects of the magnetic fields generated at some cosmic evolutionary stages (Machida et al 2009;Machida & Nakamura 2015;Higuchi et al 2018). While these points are important to fully understand the star formation process during the evolution of cosmic structures, they are tangled up making it difficult to capture the metallicity effect on the stellar mass distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with cosmic structure formation, not only the metallicity but other important factors evolve with time. The evolution of the abundance pattern of metals or the composition of dust grains (Schneider et al 2012;Chiaki et al 2016;Chiaki & Yoshida 2020), heating by the warmer cosmic microwave background (CMB) at high redshift (Smith & Sigurdsson 2007;Jappsen et al 2009;Schneider & Omukai 2010;Meece et al 2014;Bovino et al 2014;Safranek-Shrader et al 2014;Riaz et al 2020), the strength of the turbulent motion induced by the expansion of H ii regions or by SN explosions (Smith et al 2015;Chiaki et al 2018), and the effects of the magnetic fields generated at some cosmic evolutionary stages (Machida et al 2009;Machida & Nakamura 2015;Higuchi et al 2018). While these points are important to fully understand the star formation process during the evolution of cosmic structures, they are tangled up making it difficult to capture the metallicity effect on the stellar mass distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another scenario predicts the formation of seed black holes from very compact nuclear star clusters, which may form at redshifts of ∼10−15, after some metal enrichment has occurred so that metal line-cooling becomes effective, and in the presence of A&A 572, A22 (2014) trace amounts of dust (Schneider et al 2003;Portegies Zwart et al 2004;Schneider et al 2012a,b;Omukai et al 2005;Omukai 2012;Clark et al 2008;Klessen et al 2012;Dopcke et al 2011Dopcke et al , 2013Safranek-Shrader et al 2014;Bovino et al 2014a). In such a cluster, stellar collisions can occur in a runaway fashion and lead to the formation of a very massive star, finally resulting in a seed black hole with a mass up to ∼3000 M (Begelman & Rees 1978;Devecchi & Volonteri 2009;Devecchi et al 2010Devecchi et al , 2012Lupi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frebel et al 2010) suggest that at the metallicity (𝑍 crit ) at which the metal cooling function dominates over the molecular one, the modalities of SF transition from Population III SF regime to the standard Population II-I regime. Different studies suggest 𝑍 crit varies from ∼10 −6 𝑍 (Schneider et al 2006) to ∼10 −3 𝑍 (Bromm & Loeb 2003;Bovino et al 2014). For this analysis we adopt the latter as our metallicity threshold.…”
Section: Star Formation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%