2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Coherent 1H–1T Heterostructures in Single-Layer MoS2 on Au(111)

Abstract: Heterojunctions of semiconductors and metals are the fundamental building blocks of modern electronics. Coherent heterostructures between dissimilar materials can be achieved by composition, doping, or heteroepitaxy of chemically different elements. Here, we report the formation of coherent single-layer 1H−1T MoS 2 heterostructures by mechanical exfoliation on Au(111), which are chemically homogeneous with matched lattices but show electronically distinct semiconducting (1H phase) and metallic (1T phase) chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When water is adsorbed in between layers of MoS 2 , it causes a disruption in the MoS 2 lattice, like a bubble in a decal. This has been observed experimentally for MoS 2 on Au substrates . To quantify the changes in the MoS 2 structure induced by adsorbates, we repeated the DFT calculations from Section with a structure consisting of 7 × 7 unit cells of MoS 2 to ensure that the edges of the simulation box are far enough away from the water to not be affected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When water is adsorbed in between layers of MoS 2 , it causes a disruption in the MoS 2 lattice, like a bubble in a decal. This has been observed experimentally for MoS 2 on Au substrates . To quantify the changes in the MoS 2 structure induced by adsorbates, we repeated the DFT calculations from Section with a structure consisting of 7 × 7 unit cells of MoS 2 to ensure that the edges of the simulation box are far enough away from the water to not be affected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This has been observed experimentally for MoS 2 on Au substrates. 57 To quantify the changes in the MoS 2 structure induced by adsorbates, we repeated the DFT calculations from Section 3.2 with a structure consisting of 7 × 7 unit cells of MoS 2 to ensure that the edges of the simulation box are far enough away from the water to not be affected. Figure 7 shows the displacement in the Z direction (normal to the lamella) of the Mo atoms in the layer directly above the adsorbed water molecule and the defect site.…”
Section: Water Adsorption In Bulk Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MoS 2 and SnS 2 possess a similar formula MX 2 , consisting of a transition-metal layer sandwiched between two layers of chalcogen S atoms. Yet, the Mo–S length (2.41 Å) is shorter than the Sn–S length (2.59 Å). , The substitution of Sn atoms into the MoS 2 lattice generates additional strain in the host lattice, thereby contributing to the change in Raman peaks versus doping concentrations (Figure b). , Simultaneously, the Raman intensity is reduced, with a smaller I (E 2g 1 )/ I (A 1g ) value of Sn-doped flakes than that of pristine MoS 2 flakes, as shown in Figure c, since the matrix elements and selection rules for Raman-active vibrational modes are principally determined by the lattice symmetry . The sample domain (Figure d) revealed uniform MoS 2 via the Raman intensity mapping of A 1g (Mo–S) (Figure e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5a, as reported. 31,48 The resulting Mo and S peaks are characteristic of MoS 2 at the 2H phase with minimal oxidation, less than 2% for Mo 6+ . Fig.…”
Section: Nanoscale Papermentioning
confidence: 99%