2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of continuous platinum layer on top of an organic monolayer by electrochemical deposition followed by electroless deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the different behavior is not clear, but it probably combines the more open nature of the cyanide SAM (θ CN = 0.5), which probably favors penetration, with a lower barrier for the diffusion of the cations over the adlayer, which would be sensitive to the chemical nature of the cation. [26,32,40]. As noted by Silien et al…”
Section: Metalli Metalli Metallimentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The reason for the different behavior is not clear, but it probably combines the more open nature of the cyanide SAM (θ CN = 0.5), which probably favors penetration, with a lower barrier for the diffusion of the cations over the adlayer, which would be sensitive to the chemical nature of the cation. [26,32,40]. As noted by Silien et al…”
Section: Metalli Metalli Metallimentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Electrodeposition could be an attractive method for the metallization of monolayers because it does not require expensive vacuum equipment, and it is often easier to control. However, this methodology has so far been unsuccessful since the formation of clusters, or the penetration of metal ions from the solution or even metal wires through the defect sites in the monolayer are often observed-resulting in very low yield devices [84,359,360]. Although these problems-which are mainly associated with the existence of imperfections in the monolayer and the presence of free metal ions in the solution-have been able to be overcome or reduced [22,[361][362][363], still exits serious limitations in this approach.…”
Section: Fabrication Of the Top Contact Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors, especially the electrical current density in the unit surface of the cathode, determine the deposition rate. The electrical current distribution in lumps of cathodic surfaces are more than recesses, and this change in current density affects metal distribution, as the thickness of coating deposition corresponds with the current density (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: General Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%