With the development of modern industries, the sustainability of critical resources has attracted worldwide attention considering the entire supply chain. With a large industrial sector size in China, a safe supply of metal resources is crucial to ensure the effective operation of the whole industry. Although specific criticality analyses have been applied to identify critical resources in some regions, including Europe and the USA, they are not ready to be directly applied in the case of China because the structure of China's industry is remarkably different from other areas. In this research, a three-dimensional methodology considering supply safety, domestic economy, and environmental risk is demonstrated, where Chinese industrial conditions are specifically considered. In total, 64 materials were introduced to perform the criticality assessment, and 18 metals were classified with a high criticality degree in the three-dimensional criticality space. With the obtained findings decision-makers can formulate strategic deployment to promote resource management.
INTRODUCTIONMetal resources, which are foundational to economic and social development, are crucial for ensuring the sustainable development of the global manufacturing industry. In the 21st century, the consumption of critical metals increased sharply, leading to a greater demand and supply risk of global metal resources (Eggert and Roderick, 2011;Hayes and McCullough, 2018). To cope with the potential supply risk of mineral resources in the future, many countries have taken effective measures (China, Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2016a;Gardner and Colwill, 2018;Rabe et al., 2017). To minimize imports and dependence, the United States is accelerating the security of supply by actively promoting the extraction and recycling of domestic critical mineral resources (DOE.