1985
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(85)80172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of FeS and its effect on the electrode reactions of the Fe(II)/Fe system in thiocyanate solutions at mercury electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…while in accordance with the literature the C3/A3 peak pair can be assigned to the reversible electrochemical exchange reaction with Hg [14][15][16][17][18]:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…while in accordance with the literature the C3/A3 peak pair can be assigned to the reversible electrochemical exchange reaction with Hg [14][15][16][17][18]:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It would be likely that the energies of Fe(II) reduction on FeS and Fe(0) would be different, so there should be a shift in reduction potential. This possibility is consistent with Winklers statement [19] that peaks A1 1 and A1 2 in Figure 1 are due to the oxidation of iron deposited on the surface that was completely and partly covered by FeS, pointing at a similar cathodic process. We believe that both peaks represent oxidation of Fe(II) deposited on the FeS surface since the sum of A1 1 and A1 2 charges (not shown) is proportional to the concentration of free Fe(II).…”
Section: C1 Doubletssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The peaks A1 1 and A1 2 are due to the oxidation of iron deposited on the surface that was completely and partly covered by FeS [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we offer a completely new interpretation of the peak at −1.1 V, ,, which has some similarities to that of Davison et al who attributed the peak at −1.1 V (our C1) to surface species. Although we have discussed FeS electrochemical behavior in the previous papers, ,, the explanation of the most important reactions presented in Table is stated here in brief: The C1 peak arises from the reduction of Fe­(II) or its labile complexes on the Hg electrode modified by a FeS layer. , Fe­(0) deposited at the C1 peak potential is oxidized in reverse scan at the A1 peak. , The C3/A3 peak couple corresponds to the electrochemical transformation of FeS to HgS. , It is important to notice that the A3 peak can only be recorded in solutions of Fe­(II) and S­(-II), which are initially supersaturated with respect to mackinawite (FeS mw ) (i.e. at concentrations of iron and sulfide that satisfied K s for mackinawite). ,,,, Therefore, the A3 peak shown here was used as an indication (ultimately measure) of the presence of FeS NPs. , We already showed that experimental conditions (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%