2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1384-1076(01)00077-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of high mass X-ray black hole binaries

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
155
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As has first been argued by Brown et al (1999) and then has been confirmed in detailed calculations by Brown et al (2001), this has to do with differences during helium core burning. Basically the final structure of a star is very different depending on whether the star burns helium with a hydrogen-burning shell around it or without the hydrogen-burning shell (as one would expect if the star loses its envelope before or early during helium burning).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As has first been argued by Brown et al (1999) and then has been confirmed in detailed calculations by Brown et al (2001), this has to do with differences during helium core burning. Basically the final structure of a star is very different depending on whether the star burns helium with a hydrogen-burning shell around it or without the hydrogen-burning shell (as one would expect if the star loses its envelope before or early during helium burning).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The main effects, besides from mass loss/gain, are changes in the stellar rotation rate, the nuclear burning scheme and the wind mass-loss rate (de Mink 2010;Langer 2012). As a result, binary interactions affect the final core mass prior to the collapse (Brown et al 2001;Podsiadlowski et al 2004), and therefore possibly the nature of the SN event, the type of compact remnant left behind, the amount of envelope mass ejected, and thus the kinematics of the post-SN binary. Given that almost all massive stars are members of close binaries (Chini et al 2012) and 70 per cent of them interact with their companion star (Sana et al 2012), it is important to probe the evolution leading to SNe in close binaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a close binary scenario, however, removal of the hydrogen-rich outer mantle via Case A mass transfer results in a reduced post-MS helium core, and ongoing Case B transfer during shell burning will leave a low mass (≤10 M ) helium-burning WR (P05), permitting isolated neutron star formation within 5 Myr via a type Ib/c supernova if the kick velocity is sufficient to disrupt the system 10 . Neutron star formation may also occur for massive binaries with initial periods greater than a few weeks; such systems will not undergo Roche lobe overflow until core hydrogen burning is complete and therefore form higher-mass helium cores than Case A systems, but if Case B or early-Case C mass transfer can suppress hydrogen shell burning before core helium burning is complete then the consequent reduction in the mass of the iron core may limit black hole formation (Brown et al 2001). Further results on the distribution of binaries on Wd1 from our VLT/FLAMES survey and follow-up observations will therefore allow strong constraints to be placed on the formation channels for such systems.…”
Section: The Wd1 Magnetarmentioning
confidence: 99%