“…The ability of a CH group to form C–H···X bonds often follows the trend C(sp)–H > C(sp 2 )–H > C(sp 3 )–H, , but introducing electronegative substituents could significantly change it. CH acidity can also be significantly changed, for example, the p K a for (CN) 3 CH is 5.13 and that for (CN) 2 CH 2 is 11.19. , After the proton transfer, complexes of the type C – ···HX + could be formed, i.e., zwitterionic pairs with carbanions. − On the one hand, the C – ···HX + hydrogen bond might be a local energy minimum along the proton transfer pathway, as, for example, it was demonstrated by calculations for the reaction of C 6 H 5 (CF 3 ) 2 CH with MeO – . On the other hand, after the proton transfer, a significant redistribution of electron density in the acid molecule can occur, decreasing the proton-accepting ability of the carbon atom and making the C – ···HX + form energetically unfavorable. − Besides, the C – /HX + ion pair might be solvent-separated or even completely dissociated in a polar solvent. , …”